Comparative Study of Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% and Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% with Fentanyl in Pre-Eclamptic Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the time of onset, duration of sensory blockade & motor blockade, haemodynamic effects, time duration of post-operative analgesia as well as complications of intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% and intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% with Inj. Fentanyl 20 mcg in pre-eclamptic parturients opting for elective lower segment caesarean section. Material & Methods: A total number of 60 pre-eclamptic parturients with mild to moderate preeclampsia opting for elective lower segment caesarean section were included in a prospective randomized double-blinded control study. Parturients were assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia (SAB) randomly with hyperbaric Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 1.8 ml (Group B) or hyperbaric Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 1.4 ml along with Inj. Fentanyl 20mcg (0.4ml) (Group F), total of 1.8 ml. The onset, duration, and recovery from sensory blockade and motor blockade, time required to obtain maximum sensory blockade and duration of spinal anaesthesia were noted. The statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test and student’s t-test. Results: The onset of both sensory and motor blockade was slower in group B. The durations of sensory block (150±20.24 min) and motor block (135±18.06 min) were significantly long enough in the group F. Haemodynamic parameters were significantly stable in Fentanyl group. Conclusion: The addition of Fentanyl 20 mcg to subarachnoid block in mild to moderate pre-eclamptic parturients opting for elective lower segment caesarean section, increased the duration of analgesia, with less side effects and without adverse neonatal outcome. Thus, intrathecal Fentanyl is advantageous in pre-eclamptic parturients with minimal side effects.

Authors and Affiliations

Manjula R.

Keywords

Related Articles

A Study on Haemodynamic and Adverse Effects of Intramuscular Parecoxib in Adults for Postoperative Pain Relief

Background: Postoperative pain control is generally best managed by anaesthesiologists since they offer regional anaesthetic techniques as well as pharmacological expertise in analgesics.Various postoperative analgesic m...

Comparison of the Effects of using three Different Types of Needles on Sub Arachnoid Block: A Clinical Study

Background: Anaesthesia alleviates human sufferings during the surgical procedures. It may be either General anaesthesia or Regional anaesthesia depending upon surgery. General anaesthesia imparts total sensory loss. It...

Comparative Study of Efficacy of Bupivacaine with Dexmeditomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant on Hemodynamic Changes in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

In regional anaesthesia and analgesia, maintaining better hemodynamic stability and minimal side effects is very much essential. A number of adjuvants have been combined with local anaesthesia’s (LA) to improve the effe...

The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilisation Surgeries: A Randomised Control Study

Background: Transversus abdominis plane block is a safe, simple and effective technique, widely used to provide postoperative analgesia for various abdominal surgeries. We evaluated the efficacy of Transversus abdominis...

Comparison of Intravenous Clonidine and Magnesium Sulfate on Hemodynamic Response during Laparoscopic Surgeries

Background: Both magnesium and clonidine are known to inhibit catecholamine and vasopressin release and attenuate hemodynamic response to peumoperitoneum. This randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled study was des...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP537929
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5518.14
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Manjula R. (2018). Comparative Study of Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% and Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% with Fentanyl in Pre-Eclamptic Parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(5), 782-786. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-537929