Comparing the Viewpoints of Qāḍī Sa‘īd Qummī and ‘Allāma Majlisī Concerning Essential and Attributive Unity

Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 97

Abstract

Essential and attributive unity are considered among the most important types of unity. In this writing, the views and ideas of Qāḍī Sa‘īd Qummī and ‘Allāma Majlisī concerning this issue are studied. These two great thinkers, besides being disagreed upon the meaning of essential unity (tawḥīd-i dhātī), are totally different, and rather contradictory, on the ontological principles and substructures, on the basis of which they have proved the essential unity and have discrepancies about the attributive unity, as well. One of the discourses associated with attributive unity is the doctrine of the objectivity of essence and attributes. ‘Allāma Majlisī is among its proponents and Qāḍī Sa‘īd Qummī is among the opponents; however, he accepts objectivity at the Divinity level. Acceptance of principality of existence and its essential concomitants drives ‘Allāma Majlisī toward reconciliation between tashbīh (assimilation) and tanzīh (Divine Transcendence); but Qāḍī Sa‘īd’s opposition to these principles and his belief in detachment of ranks in the existence of God, has led him to partiality to the theory of tanzīh as essence and tashbīh as attributes.

Authors and Affiliations

Sayyid Mahdi Imami Jum’A, Zakiyya Fallah Yakhdani

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study of Divine Will in the Philosophy of Spinoza and Ustād Muṭahharī

This writing addresses Divine Will from the viewpoints of the two great philosophers, Ustād Muṭahharī and Spinoza. It aims at clarifying the similarities and discrepancies existing in their viewpoints concerning the ques...

The Role of God's Names and Attributes in Semantic Degrees of Divine Promises and Threats

Among the ways of stating God's actions in the Qur'an is the causal inference (ta‘līl) of any one of them by Divine names and attributes. Promise and threat as God's actions is not an exception in this regard. According...

Seven Periods of Human Sacred History from the Isma‘īlīs' Point of View

In the second half of the 2nd/8th century, the Ismā‘īlī sect, who believed in the Imamate of Ismā‘īl, the second son of Imam Ja‘far al-Ṣādiq (A.S.), was formed. The Ismā‘īlīs brought up specific views concerning Imamate....

Intuition in Philosophy, Reasoning in Mysticism

In his recognition of being and achievement of truth, man has two instruments in his constitution and two ways before him: intellect and heart; reasoning and intuition. Some have opted the way of reasoning and underestim...

Cosmo-theological Argument in the West

Cosmo-theological argument is one of the theological arguments for [proving] the existence of God, which has been mooted since long ago and has recently been recognized in the Theo-philosophical tradition of the West and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP204730
  • DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v48i2.25953
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sayyid Mahdi Imami Jum’A, Zakiyya Fallah Yakhdani (2016). Comparing the Viewpoints of Qāḍī Sa‘īd Qummī and ‘Allāma Majlisī Concerning Essential and Attributive Unity. جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام, 48(97), 9-26. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-204730