Comparision of different modalities of treatment for ACL tear

Journal Title: National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: Knee joint derangement has a phenomenal growth in modern times owing to the immense expansion of industrial development, heavy vehicular traffic with increase in the number of accidents and enormous progress in sports-athletics. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most commonly injured ligaments of the knee. Hamstring autografts have gained popularity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in recent years primarily due to significantly decreased postoperative pain and morbidity, allowing easier rehabilitation, compared with patellar tendon auto-grafts. The current study is aimed to compare different modalities of treatment of ACL injuries-arthroscopically, open procedure, mini open and pullout suturing Aim: To compare different modalities of treatment of ACL injuries-arthroscopically, open procedure, mini open and pullout suturing. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study where all young and middle aged patients presenting with knee complaints and history of trauma to the knee in the Orthopaedics emergency and out patient department were evaluated by a thorough general and local clinical examination of the knee. The patients were included as per the specified inclusion criteria. The patients were treated using different modalities of treatment of ACL injuries-arthroscopically, open procedure, mini open and pullout suturing. The Post operative assessment was done by Lysholm Knee Score scale. Results and Discussion: In our study 52% of the patients who were treated with semitendinosus graft gave Excellent results on Lysholm Grading Scale and 55% of the patients who were operated with Quadriceps graft showed Excellent Grading on Lysholm Scale which means there is no statistical difference between outcome of ACL reconstruction and type of graft used. Also there is no significant statistical difference between type of Bundle And outcome according to Lysholm Grading as 55% of those treated with Single Bundle showed excellent results while 44% of those treated with double bundle showed excellent outcome according to Lysholm grading. Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair in ACL tear shows definitely better results with better outcome as compared to open repair of ACL tear.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Jaykumar M Patel, Dr. Kuldeep Chovatiya, Dr. Haresh M Rana, Dr. Aditya Dabhi

Keywords

Related Articles

Functional outcome of management of fracture of distal femur

Distal femoral fractures are difficult to treat and ideal treatment of such fractures will include anatomical reduction, rigid fixation of articular surfaces and early mobilization of knee joint. The purpose of the study...

Evaluation of results of micro endoscopic discectomy

Introduction: Discectomy is a common procedure carried out for treatment of lumbar disc prolapse. In lumbar disc surgery pain is the most important indication, but neurologic symptoms and signs are also considered, altho...

A report of 4 cases, on a rare entity of schwannoma in limbs i.e, outside the central nervous system

Schwannomas are lobulated, encapsulated tumours that arise from the neurilemmal cells in nerve sheaths Schwannomas are commonly seen in the central nervous system. Its occurrence in the peripheral nervous system is rare....

Assessment of the severity of club foot in neonates treated by the ponseti method in correlation with ultrasonography and foot bimalleolar angle

Introduction: Correlation of Pirani score and foot bimalleolar (FBM) angle has been used in few studies but correlation of FBM angle with ultrasonography has never been evaluated so they are being correlated in assessing...

A comparison of two different surgical treatment methods for Ao-Ota type 31a2 hip fractures in patients aged over 75 years

Introduction: The aim of the this studyis to compare PFNa application and uncemented bipolar partial prosthesis in AO/OTA 31 A2 type fractures in patients aged >75 years, in terms of functional scores and complication ra...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP506789
  • DOI -
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Jaykumar M Patel, Dr. Kuldeep Chovatiya, Dr. Haresh M Rana, Dr. Aditya Dabhi (2017). Comparision of different modalities of treatment for ACL tear. National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics, 1(3), 41-45. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-506789