Comparison Activity Test of Antioxidant of Water Extract Coffee Robusta (Coffea canephora) and Water Extract Coffee Arabica (Coffea arabica) with the Method DPPH (1,1-difenil-2-pikrilhidrazil)
Journal Title: International Journal of Life Science and Agriculture Research - Year 2024, Vol 3, Issue 07
Abstract
Coffee is one of the beverage ingredients that is widely consumed by the public In Indonesia, there are many types of coffee, including robusta coffee and arabica coffee Both of these coffees have high antioxidant content including tocopherol, tannin, and clorogenic acid which are components of polyphenols. This research aims to determine the difference in antioxidant activity of robusta coffee water extract and arabica coffee water extract with a comparison of vitamin E comparator. The antioxidant activity test was carried out using the DPPH free radical capture method by visible spectrophotometry until an EC50 value was obtained. Robusta coffee water extract, Arabica coffee water extract, and vitamin E are made with a concentration of 0.2%; 0,4%; 0,6%; 0,8%; and 1.0%, and tested for antioxidant activity with 0.1mM DPPH solution. Extract making use of the solvent water because chlorogenic acid is soluble in water and does not resist heating, so that extracted by maceration for 5 days with the replacement solvent of every 24 hours. The extract is made using water solvents because chlorogenic acid in water and, so it is extracted by maceration for 5 days with solvent changes every 24 hours. The results showed that the average EC50 value of vitamin E was 85.9863 μg/ml, robusta coffee water extract was 95.0442 μg/ml, and Arabica coffee water extract was 106.7972 μg/ml Result of test ANOVA shows the price F count (83,736) > F is tables of ( 3,885) at α ( 0,05) meaning that there is significant difference in antioxidant activity between vitamin E, robusta coffee water extract and arabica coffee water extract. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that robusta coffee water extract and arabica coffee water extract have differences in antioxidant activity determined by the DPPH method. Robusta coffee water extract has greater antioxidant activity than arabica coffee water extract.
Authors and Affiliations
Agus Suprijono, Feni Indriastuti, A. Ariani Hesti WS
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP741186
- DOI https://doi.org/10.55677/ijlsar/V03I7Y2024-20
- Views 40
- Downloads 0
Effect of NaCL and CaSO4 on Activty of Rhizobium Bacteria and Testing its Efficincy of Produceing IAA, Enzymes in Gypsiferous Soil
Rhizobium bacteria are of significant environmental and agricultural importance. However, the impact of salts on the growth of these bacteria is a crucial topic that warrants research, particularly in areas with high soi...
Growth and Yield of Seedless Watermelon Plants in Response to Soil Amendment Application
This research aims to evaluate the effect of soil amendment concentration on the growth and yield of seedless watermelon plants. This research was carried out at the agricultural land that located in Kumendung Village, M...
Analysis of Trouble in Dry Land Management and Hills in Ngada District, East Nusa Tenggara Indonesia
The district of Ngada is a high plain of hills and mountains with a very diverse topophysiography. There are some fertile areas, but there are also areas that are dry. In mountainous areas, crops such as coffee, coconut,...
Nutritional Content of Brown Rice and White Rice from Organic Rice of Mentik Susu Varieties with Parboiled Method
Parboiled rice is rice produced from milled dry grain (MDG) that has received cleaning, soaking, steaming, drying, and milling treatments. It is very rare that the parboiling process is done on brown rice or white rice....
A Study on The Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Plastic-Free Certification Systems
Regulations on plastic use are being strengthened worldwide, and consumer concerns about plastic waste are also increasing. A certification system for plastic-free products will show consumers that they trust the use of...