Comparison between the Clinical Outcome of Anterolateral and Posterior Approaches to the Hip Joint in Hip Joint Arthroplasty

Journal Title: Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of anterolateral versus posterior approach to the hip joint in hip joint arthroplasty. Methods: The prospective study was carried out on 52 patients who suffered from traumatic and degenerative conditions of the hip joint. e patients were treated by hip joint arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty/total hip arthroplasty) through anterolateral approach or posterior approach. 34 patients were operated using the posterior approach and 18 patients were operated using anterolateral approach. e age of patients was ranged from 42 to 68 years. e patients were followed from the date of discharge to the end of 6 months from the date of surgery. Results: The average length of hospital stay was 11.74 ± 1.78 days for the posterior group compared to 10.94 ± 1.47 days for the anterolateral group. e means of the scores of both the groups at the end of 6-month follow-up period using the Modied d’Aubigne and Postel method were compared and were found to be signicantly different. e anterolateral group had a mean score of 36.22 ± 1.17 compared to the mean score of posterior group which was 35.35 ± 1.28. 2 patients of 34 (5.88%) from the posterior group experienced post-operative dislocation. No patient in the anterolateral group experienced post-operative dislocation. Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced surgeon, both approaches were found to be excellent for hip joint arthroplasty as the mean functional outcome score was 36.22 ± 1.17 for the anterolateral group and 35.35 ± 1.28 for the posterior group, both were more than 32, that is, excellent outcome. Anterolateral group showed beer post-operative recovery as compared to the posterior group. Dislocation was found to be a complication in the posterior group with a dislocation rate of 5.88%.

Authors and Affiliations

Ashwani Sadana, Chandra P Pal, Brijesh Sharma, R K Shakunt R K Shakunt, Mohit Sharma, Vikas Mishra

Keywords

Related Articles

The role of concern and risk perception in anti-osteoporosis behavior

Background: Concern for disease and perception of risk for a disease is known to affect protective behavior Aim: to determine the effect that level of concern for osteoporosis, as well as self-perceived risk of osteoporos...

Evaluation of Role of Antibiotic-Impregnated Beads in Compound Fractures (Compound Grade 2 and Grade 3)

Background: Open fractures are still a burden on orthopedic surgeons. The main goals in managing such injuries include infection prevention, fracture stabilization, skin and soft-tissue coverage, and adjacent joint mobil...

Osteomalacia, a Late Complication of Ichthyosis Vulgaris: A Case Report

Introduction: Ichthyosis, a disorder of keratinization may result in impaired synthesis of Vitamin D, thus poor mineralization of bones. Case Report: We are reporting a case of 18-year-old female, who presented with prog...

Efficacy of Hydrogen Peroxide as Adjuvant in Preventing Recurrence of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Aim: To study the effect of hydrogen peroxide (3%) as an adjuvant in preventing local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone. Material & Methods: 32 cases of giant cell tumor treated during 2010 -16 were taken in this st...

Role of Ultrasound in the Management of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip with Pavlik Harness

Background: Ultrasonography has been accepted nowadays as a useful imaging modality in the early detection and monitoring treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip with the Pavlik harness. Graf’s method of angle ca...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP553740
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ashwani Sadana, Chandra P Pal, Brijesh Sharma, R K Shakunt R K Shakunt, Mohit Sharma, Vikas Mishra (2018). Comparison between the Clinical Outcome of Anterolateral and Posterior Approaches to the Hip Joint in Hip Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases, 0(0), 20-23. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-553740