Comparison between the Clinical Outcome of Anterolateral and Posterior Approaches to the Hip Joint in Hip Joint Arthroplasty

Journal Title: Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of anterolateral versus posterior approach to the hip joint in hip joint arthroplasty. Methods: The prospective study was carried out on 52 patients who suffered from traumatic and degenerative conditions of the hip joint. e patients were treated by hip joint arthroplasty (bipolar hemiarthroplasty/total hip arthroplasty) through anterolateral approach or posterior approach. 34 patients were operated using the posterior approach and 18 patients were operated using anterolateral approach. e age of patients was ranged from 42 to 68 years. e patients were followed from the date of discharge to the end of 6 months from the date of surgery. Results: The average length of hospital stay was 11.74 ± 1.78 days for the posterior group compared to 10.94 ± 1.47 days for the anterolateral group. e means of the scores of both the groups at the end of 6-month follow-up period using the Modied d’Aubigne and Postel method were compared and were found to be signicantly different. e anterolateral group had a mean score of 36.22 ± 1.17 compared to the mean score of posterior group which was 35.35 ± 1.28. 2 patients of 34 (5.88%) from the posterior group experienced post-operative dislocation. No patient in the anterolateral group experienced post-operative dislocation. Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced surgeon, both approaches were found to be excellent for hip joint arthroplasty as the mean functional outcome score was 36.22 ± 1.17 for the anterolateral group and 35.35 ± 1.28 for the posterior group, both were more than 32, that is, excellent outcome. Anterolateral group showed beer post-operative recovery as compared to the posterior group. Dislocation was found to be a complication in the posterior group with a dislocation rate of 5.88%.

Authors and Affiliations

Ashwani Sadana, Chandra P Pal, Brijesh Sharma, R K Shakunt R K Shakunt, Mohit Sharma, Vikas Mishra

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Results after Internal Fixation of Fracture Clavicle by Titanium Elastic Nailing System/Plate

Background: Fractures of clavicle are common injuries with incidence of 2.6-8% of all fractures and 44% of all shoulder injuries [1]. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the results and complications of internal fix...

AVN of All Four Heads in a Case of T Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Rare Case Report

Introduction: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of bone is a significant long-term complication of treatment of hematological malignancies that can result in significant morbidity and alteration of quality of life. There are a fe...

Repair of Chronic Tendoachilles Rupture – Bosworth Technique versus Peroneus Brevis Transfer Technique – A Retrospective and Prospective Study

Introduction: Chronic rupture of Achilles tendon causes marked functional impairment. The recommended treatment for this is surgery and various techniques have been reported in the literature. Materials and Methods: From...

Osteomalacia, a Late Complication of Ichthyosis Vulgaris: A Case Report

Introduction: Ichthyosis, a disorder of keratinization may result in impaired synthesis of Vitamin D, thus poor mineralization of bones. Case Report: We are reporting a case of 18-year-old female, who presented with prog...

Need for the Research Cultures

One of the major hurdles for scientific research in India is lack of Research culture specially in medical field and in field of orthopaedic surgery. In countries that have good research output, the universities and inst...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP553740
  • DOI -
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ashwani Sadana, Chandra P Pal, Brijesh Sharma, R K Shakunt R K Shakunt, Mohit Sharma, Vikas Mishra (2018). Comparison between the Clinical Outcome of Anterolateral and Posterior Approaches to the Hip Joint in Hip Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases, 0(0), 20-23. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-553740