COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CIRCUMCISION- CONVENTIONAL (DORSAL SLIT AND EXCISION) VS. GUILLOTINE

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 31

Abstract

BACKGROUND Circumcision is the surgical removal of the prepuce (foreskin), either in whole or in part. Religion, cultural, medical and recently public health reasons are known to be the major indications of the procedure.(1,2) Circumcision is one of the commonest procedures done now-a-day by surgeons. Various methods of circumcision are dorsal slit technique, plastibell technique, hollister bell technique, Guillotine method, sleeve technique etc. Each method has its own advantage as well as disadvantage. So, we have done a comparative study between two methods of circumcision namely Conventional (Dorsal Slit Method) and Guillotine for various aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study was non-randomised controlled trial including 131 patients. Group A underwent circumcision by Conventional method (i.e. Dorsal slit) and Group B underwent by Guillotine method. The study and the sample size were taken for convenience during the study. RESULTS Post-operative pain would be moderate in majority of patients with Guillotine circumcision as compared to mild pain in Conventional circumcision on post-operative day 3. On long follow-up, pain was less with Conventional method (3.04%) compared to Guillotine method (26.15%). Post-operative oedema was less with Conventional method (1.52%) compared to Guillotine method (26.15%). Cosmetic appearance was better with Conventional method (72.21%) compared to Guillotine method (44.61%) on long follow-up. CONCLUSION Conventional method has a statistically and clinically less pain, less post-operative complication and better cosmetic outcome compared to Guillotine method on one-month follow-up. So, Conventional (i.e. Dorsal slit) method should be preferred over Guillotine method for circumcision.

Authors and Affiliations

Ashwinkumar Shankerdan Gadhvi, Kamlesh Jamanadas Galani, Bhargav Ashwinbhai Trivedi

Keywords

Related Articles

A RARE CASE OF BROWN TUMOUR OVER LEFT ILIUM- A CASE REPORT

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 40 years old female patient came to our hospital with pain over left iliac bone, which was gradually increased since 8 months and was unable to bear weight on left lower limb for last 2 weeks. On p...

EFFICACY OF KETAMINE GARGLE FOR ATTENUATING POSTOPERATIVE SORE THROAT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITH ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

BACKGROUND Postoperative sore throat is ranked by American Society of Anesthesiologists as eighth most important problem of current clinical anaesthesiology. This study is to evaluate whether preoperative gargling with k...

ECTOPIC THE OVERRATED DANGER

BACKGROUND Motherhood an eternal, universal and inherent dream which every woman has!! This dream may not always be pleasant and it can involve tragedies as well. One of this is ectopic pregnancy, a pregnancy which can b...

A STUDY OF CLINICAL, SONOLOGICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION OF OVARIAN TUMOURS

BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the second most common of all gynaecological cancers and accounts for 10-15% of gynaecological malignancies in developing countries including India. Of all gynaecological cancers, ovarian mal...

CONGENITAL MALFORMATION IN STILLBIRTHS- A HOSPITAL BASED STUDY

BACKGROUND Globally 2.6 million stillbirths occur every year with three fourth of them occurring in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Congenital malformations are a major cause of stillbirths. No studies have been carri...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP539079
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2018/777
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ashwinkumar Shankerdan Gadhvi, Kamlesh Jamanadas Galani, Bhargav Ashwinbhai Trivedi (2018). COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CIRCUMCISION- CONVENTIONAL (DORSAL SLIT AND EXCISION) VS. GUILLOTINE. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 7(31), 3448-3451. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-539079