Comparison of 5µg and 10 µg of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant with Bupivacaine (heavy) under Spinal anaesthesia in Urological surgeries

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Objectives: This study is to know the efficacy of 5µg and 10µg of Dexmedetomidine adding to 0.5% bupivacaine (heavy) under spinal anaesthesia for urological procedures. The purpose of our study is to know sensory onset, motor onset, sensory blockade duration, motor blockade duration, effective analgesia duration, rescue analgesia duration, VAS score, haemodynamic factors like heart rate and blood pressure and also untowards adverse effects. Materials and Method: In a prospective randomized study, 120 patients of ASA grade I/II aged between 20 - 60 years undergoing urological surgeries were divided randomly into three groups of 40 each. Group D5- 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5ml) + 5 µg Dexmedetomidine, Group D10- 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (2.5ml) + 10 µg Dexmedetomidine, Group BS- 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5mg + normal saline 0.5ml. Results was analysed using one way ANOVA and Kruskal wallis test. p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: In Dexmedetomidine groups sensory and motor blockade onset was early (Group D10>Group D5). Sensory blockade duration and motor blockade duration was increased. Effective and rescue analgesia duration was also increased in the order of GroupD10>Group D5>Group BS. There was no clinically significant haemodynamic parameters alteration without any adverse effects/complication among three groups. Conclusion: 10µg dexmedetomidine enhances the duration of analgesia and patients remained pain free for a longer period of duration in post-operative period compared to plain bupivacaine or 5µg dexmedetomidine with better haemodynamic stability with minimal or no adverse effects.

Authors and Affiliations

Mahadeva Prasad DR, Anitha Hanji S, Narasimha Gnani BC

Keywords

Related Articles

Oral premedication in children: Comparison of combination of midazolam-ketamine and oral midazolam- A Randomised trial

Introduction Premedication with sedative drugs is often used in paediatric practice as one of the modalities to reduce preoperative anxiety in children undergoing surgery It reduces both patient and parental anxiety and...

Palonosetron-dexamethasone versus ondansetron-dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a preliminary, randomized, double blinded study

Introduction: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is associated with wound dehiscence, pulmonary aspiration, electrolyte disturbances, delayed recovery and patient dis-satisfaction. The present study was aimed to c...

Saddle block spinal anesthesia and its effect on hemodynamic status and analgesia

Introduction The sitting position is often used for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia especially when lower lumbar and sacral levels of sensory anesthesia are required An advantage of this position is that the compli...

A comparison of intrathecal Dexmeditomidine and Buprenorphine as an adjuvants to isobaric spinal 0.75% Ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower limb surgery

Introduction: Ropivacaine is the single enantiomer specific local anaesthetic having reduced potential for cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Its characteristics of slow onset, shorter duration of sensory analgesia and ra...

Post intubation high airway pressure’s: An uncommon case of kinked tube

High airway pressures post intubation is a critical event which requires the urgent intervention of the attending anesthesiologist We report a case of high peak pressure and plateau pressure after intubation which was ac...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP313386
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0067
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mahadeva Prasad DR, Anitha Hanji S, Narasimha Gnani BC (2017). Comparison of 5µg and 10 µg of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant with Bupivacaine (heavy) under Spinal anaesthesia in Urological surgeries. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(3), 324-328. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-313386