COMPARISON OF BOLUS INTRAVENOUS EPHEDRINE AND PHENYLEPHRINE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE IN CAESAREAN SECTION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 19

Abstract

CONTEXT (BACKGROUND) Hypotension following spinal anaesthesia is a common problem. Preloading with IV Fluids alone is not sufficient, because inadequately treated hypotension during Caesarian section causes undue effects on both mother and fetus. So concomitant use of vasopressor drugs to treat spinal hypotension proved useful and well established. AIM To compare the efficacy of intravenous phenylephrine versus intravenous ephedrine for correction of intra operative hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective as well as emergency caesarean sections. DESIGN A randomized controlled study of patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia for elective and emergency caesarean section. METHODS & MATERIALS The present study includes 100 patients divided into two groups each of 50 patients. Group P (Phenylephrine group), Group E (Ephedrine group.) The baseline heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were measured. Whenever Hypotension ( fall in BP >20% of baseline or less than 90 mm of Hg )occurred, Group P received Phenylephrine 40 mcg and Group E received 6 mg Ephedrine as intravenous bolus. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Was done using Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney test. ‘p’ value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant RESULTS & CONCLUSION Phenylephrine in a dose of 40 microgram is more efficacious in comparison to Ephedrine 6 milligrams in maintaining arterial blood pressure following hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in Caesarean section. Phenylephrine has a quicker peak effect (within 2 minutes of IV bolus) as compared to Ephedrine (within 10 minutes of IV bolus) APGAR Score at 1 and 5 minutes is comparable in both Group P and Group E.

Authors and Affiliations

Rama Krishna Reddy Mudiganti, Rajkumar J, Aruna Subhash T

Keywords

Related Articles

PREVALENCE OF INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE AMONG STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS ISOLATES RESISTANT TO ERYTHROMYCIN

BACKGROUND Clindamycin is an effective drug to treat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Reporting S. aureus as susceptible to clindamycin without checking for inducible clindamycin resistance may lead to...

MICROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF KERATOMYCOSIS IN PATIENTS OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN WESTERN UTTAR PRADESH

BACKGROUND Corneal infections are one of the predominant causes of ocular concern worldwide especially in agriculture based developing countries. The aim of the study is to evaluate the aetiology and risk factors associa...

ECLAMPSIA, A MAJOR BURDEN ON MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IN TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND Eclampsia is very common obstetric emergency and major cause of both maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in India. AIM The aim of study was to evaluate its incidence, clinical profile and maternal a...

CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION OF LYMHADENOPATHY IN HIV POSITIVE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenopathy is common in HIV infected individuals as lymphoid tissue is a major target and reservoir of the Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well for opportunistic infections. AIM: Clinical assessmen...

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ULTRASONIC PLACENTAL GRADING DURING THIRD TRIMESTER IN HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY AND ITS CORRELATION WITH FETAL OUTCOME

Pre-eclampsia is a common (7% of all pregnancies) disorder in which normal haemodynamic response is compromised. Pre-eclampsia is an important cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Inspite of its relevant...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP233860
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2016/180
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rama Krishna Reddy Mudiganti, Rajkumar J, Aruna Subhash T (2016). COMPARISON OF BOLUS INTRAVENOUS EPHEDRINE AND PHENYLEPHRINE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE IN CAESAREAN SECTION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 3(19), 792-797. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-233860