Comparison of Buprenorphine and Tramadol as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is a good alternative to general anaesthesia for upper limb surgery below shoulder as it avoids the untoward effects of general anaesthesia. Block when given only with local anaesthetic can’t prolong postoperative analgesia. Presence of opioid receptors in the peripheral nervous system allows us to use various opioids as an adjuvant to achieve prolong postoperative analgesia. This study was done to compare tramadol and buprenorphine as an adjuvant to 0.35% bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods: A prospective, randomized study was done in 80 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class I and II undergoing elective upper limb orthopedic surgeries under supraclavicular block. Patients were randomized into two groups of 40 each. Group B- Patients received inj. bupivacine 0.35%, 2mg/kg + inj. buprenorphine 6mg/kg. while in group T- Patients received inj. bupivacine 0.35% 2mg/kg+ inj. tramadol 2 mg/kg. Onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects of study drugs were compared in both the groups. Results: Sensory and motor block onset times were shorter in group B than in group T (p < 0.05). Motor block duration was longer in group B than in group T (p < 0.05).Similarly, duration of analgesia was longer in group B compared to group T (942.83±124.51 min vs 478.31±52.60 min) (p<0.001). Conclusion: Buprenorphine when added to bupivacaine in supraclavicular block shortened the onset of sensory and motor block , enhances the duration of motor block and duration of analgesia compared to tramadol without significant side effects.

Authors and Affiliations

Manisha Taware

Keywords

Related Articles

Four Segments Versus two Segments Paravertebral Block for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Background: Paravertebral block (PVB) has been successfully used to provide good analgesia with fewer side effects in inguinal herniorrhaphy. So, the present study was conducted to compare the characteristics of two segm...

Comparative Study of Epidural Ropivacaine HCL-Fentanyl Citrate and Ropivacaine HCL-Tramadol HCL for Postoperative Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries

Introduction: Central neuraxial adjuvant drugs, alone or in combination, are used intrathecally or epidurally for the treatment of acute and chronic painful conditions. Aims: To compare the efficacy and duration of anal...

Comparison of the Efficacy of Classic LMA (CLMA) and Proseal LMA (PLMA) in Paralysed, Anesthetized Patients

Context: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has revolutionized airway management in the administration of general anesthesia. Proseal LMA offers advantages like better sealing pressure, drain tube and lesser risk of aspiration....

Comparative Study between Modified Mallampathi and Extended Mallampathi and Thytomental Distance in Predicting Difficult Intubation in Obese Individuals

The modified Mallampati (MMP) classification is a standard method of oropharyngeal evaluation for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Previous studies have demonstrated that the predictive value of the MMP is improved whe...

Clinical Evaluation of Adding Fentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine to Intrathecal Isobaric Levobupivacaine on Spinal Block Characteristics in Patients Scheduled for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Background: Fentanyl, an opioid and dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2 agonist added to local anaesthetics in spinal anaesthesia potentiates local anaesthetics action, have analgesic properties and reduces the requirement of lo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP524328
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5118.4
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Manisha Taware (2018). Comparison of Buprenorphine and Tramadol as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(1), 22-27. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-524328