Comparison of Clinical Performance of the I-Gel with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic-A Randomized Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Maintenance of airway is an integral part of general anaesthesia. Various airway devices are used for this purpose. Hemodynamic changes are major hazards of general endotracheal anesthesia and are probably generated by direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Aim: present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices classic laryngeal mask airway and i-gel in anaesthetized, paralyzed adult patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Methodology: One hundred patients, scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia belonging to ASA class I and II were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups with 50 patients in each group. In Group I (n=50), i-gel supraglottic airway device was used and in Group L (n=50) classic laryngeal mask airway (c-LMA)was used. Both the devices were compared in relation to the ease of insertion, number of insertion attempts, time of insertion, airway leak pressure, haemodynamic changes, intra and post operative complications. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the devices with respect to ease of insertion and number of attempts of insertion. The mean airway leak pressure with i-gel was significantly higher as compared with c-LMA (26.14±2.57 and19.76±2.04 cm H2O, respectively, p=0.0001). The mean time of insertion for i-gel was 17.26±2.9 secs which was significantly shorter compared to c-LMA with a mean insertion time of 24.9±4.8 secs (p=0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in haemodynamic changes and the postoperative complications between the devices. Conclusion: Both i-gel and c-LMA are easy to insert and provide an effective airway during positive pressure ventilation, with i-gel providing a better airway sealing pressure as compared to c-LMA.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr R Pandu Naik

Keywords

Related Articles

Prevalence of Depression and its Impact on Perceived Social Support in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-sectional Hospital-based Study

Background: Depression is the silent killer of modern era. In India there is sharp increase in elderly population. Substantial number of elderly likely to have physical and mental co-morbidity. Deficit in perceived suppo...

Spectrum of Bronchoscopy at Tertiary Care Hospital at Jaipur in Rajasthan

Introduction: Era of bronchoscopy began when German laryngologist Gustav Killan in 1876 and flexible fibro optic bronchoscope was introduced by Ikada in 1964. Bronchoscope has become an important diagnostic as well as th...

A Prospective Study Comparing Oxaliplatin & 5-Fu with Gemcitabine & Cisplatin in Advanced Stage Carcinoma Gall Bladder

Background: Overall incidence of Gallbladder (GB) malignancy is rare but it is the most common primary hepatobiliary carcinoma. Its incidence is highest in India and median survival is less than 6 months. Different chemo...

Vitamin D: A Review on Metabolism and Regulating Factors (Part I)

Vitamin D although was identified in early years of 20th century as a vital component needed for the treatment of rickets, it remained unexplored for a long period. Key findings in recent years brought Vitamin D again in...

A Study on Microbiological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Endotracheal Aspirate in Patients Suspected of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background: Respiratory infections in critically ill patients are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients who are mechanically ventilated are at high risk of acquiring respiratory tract infections due to a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213262
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr R Pandu Naik (2016). Comparison of Clinical Performance of the I-Gel with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic-A Randomized Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 4(2), 9360-9370. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213262