Comparison of efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in rural South India

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Conjunctival inflammation due to allergy is known as allergic conjunctivitis. Common ocular symptoms may be itching, swelling of eyelids, watering, watery discharge, photophobia and foreign body sensation. Aims and Objectives: To Compare the efficacy of Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.1% and Azelastine Hydrochloride 0.05% Eye drops for Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in Rural South India. Methodology: A prospective clinical trial in 74 patients was carried out. Patients by random selection were given treatment by Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.1% and Azelastine Hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologist 0, 3rd, 7th and 14th day after starting treatment. During visits the symptom were graded from zero to three scale. Result: The mean age in Olopatadine group was 18± 3.6 years and in Azelastine group was 19± 4.4 years. There were 26 Males and 11 Females in Olopatadine group and 28 Males and 9 Females in Azelastine group. The mean values for the duration of disease in both the groups were 2.8± 2.2 months and 2.9± 2.4 months respectively in Olopatadine and Azelastine group. The symptoms were compared in the two groups on 3rd, 7th and 14th day after starting treatment. The score given by the Ophthalmologist were markedly lower in both groups after treatment during all visits. (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both Olopatadine and Azelastine reduced symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis very significantly however Olopatadine was more effective.

Authors and Affiliations

Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Kunal Verma

Keywords

Related Articles

Quantification of peripapillary RNFL thickness with the help of OCT in normal, ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous eyes

Aims To quantify and compare the retinal nerve fiber thickness in normal ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous eyes using Optical coherence tomography OCTMaterials and Methods Patients were divided in to three groups of 3...

Risk factors and visual outcome in presenile cataract

Objective To study the risk factors and visual outcome in patients of presenile cataractMaterials and Methods A cross sectional observational study was conducted between January 2016 and January 2017 at a tertiary health...

The comparison of intraocular pressure lowering efficacy of 0.5% timolol maleate versus 0.0015% tafluprost in cases of primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Objectives: To compare the intraocular pressure lowering efficacy of 0.5% timolol maleate versus 0.0015% tafluprost in cases of primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Methods and Materials: This prospective...

Assessment of visual field defects in cerebrovascular disease (CVD)

To expedite the rehabilitation process of CVD patients it becomes imperative to identify and assess the extent of the Visual Field defect and the type of CVD Through this study we aim to assess the visual field loss in p...

Surgical and visual outcome of posterior polar cataract

Abstract Introduction: Posterior polar cataract is a rare form of congenital cataract with incidence ranging from 3 to 5 in 10001-2. It is bilateral in 65–80% of the cases with no gender predilection3. Posterior polar ca...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP299357
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-1451.2017.0051
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Kunal Verma (2017). Comparison of efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in rural South India. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 3(2), 207-209. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-299357