Comparison of efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in rural South India

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Conjunctival inflammation due to allergy is known as allergic conjunctivitis. Common ocular symptoms may be itching, swelling of eyelids, watering, watery discharge, photophobia and foreign body sensation. Aims and Objectives: To Compare the efficacy of Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.1% and Azelastine Hydrochloride 0.05% Eye drops for Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in Rural South India. Methodology: A prospective clinical trial in 74 patients was carried out. Patients by random selection were given treatment by Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.1% and Azelastine Hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops. Patients were assessed by ophthalmologist 0, 3rd, 7th and 14th day after starting treatment. During visits the symptom were graded from zero to three scale. Result: The mean age in Olopatadine group was 18± 3.6 years and in Azelastine group was 19± 4.4 years. There were 26 Males and 11 Females in Olopatadine group and 28 Males and 9 Females in Azelastine group. The mean values for the duration of disease in both the groups were 2.8± 2.2 months and 2.9± 2.4 months respectively in Olopatadine and Azelastine group. The symptoms were compared in the two groups on 3rd, 7th and 14th day after starting treatment. The score given by the Ophthalmologist were markedly lower in both groups after treatment during all visits. (P<0.05). Conclusion: Both Olopatadine and Azelastine reduced symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis very significantly however Olopatadine was more effective.

Authors and Affiliations

Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Kunal Verma

Keywords

Related Articles

Evaluation of changes in IOP and anterior chamber parameters post laser irodotomy using pentacam system

ntroduction: Aim of the study was to evaluate IOP changes and anterior chamber parameters (depth and volume), in primary angle closure (PAC) cases after laser peripheral irodotomy (LPI) using Pentacam system in OPD patie...

A study of incidence of posterior capsular opacification after cataract surgery with square edge PMMA intra ocular lens

Introduction: PCO usually leads to a decrease in visual acuity (VA), glare disability and a loss of contrast sensitivity. It has been reported earlier that sharp edge intraocular lens optics are better than rounded edge...

Potential for hospital cornea retrieval programme in a rural medical college

Abstract Background: Corneal diseases are an important cause of blindness in our country. Visual rehabilitation of the corneal blind is possible by transplantation (Keratoplasty) of cornea retrieved from voluntary eye do...

Comparative study of endothelial cell loss in trabeculectomy with combined small incision cataract surgery (SICS), trabeculectomy procedure and temporal small incision cataract surgery (SICS) alone

When a patient suffers from coexisting cataract and glaucoma the choice of surgery may be a combined procedure of cataract extraction and trabeculectomy as a onestage procedure or trabeculectomy first to restore visual r...

Astigmatic change following excision of double-headed monocular pterygium (DMP)

Introduction To study the effect of excision of double headed monocular pterygium on astigmatismMaterials and Methods 8 Patients of DMP presenting from January 2016 to December 2017 were treated with excision of pterygiu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP299357
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-1451.2017.0051
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Kunal Verma (2017). Comparison of efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% eye drops for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in rural South India. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 3(2), 207-209. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-299357