Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine with Midazolam in Prolonging Spinal Anaesthesia with Ropivacaine

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Midazolam and dexmedetomidine both being sedatives, but the latter with additional analgesic properties is expected to prolong the duration of sensory and motor block obtained with spinal anaesthesia. Aim: To compare intravenous dexmedetomidine with midazolam and placebo with respect to sensory and motor block duration, analgesia, and sedation in patients undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries with intrathecal ropivacaine anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this single blind placebo controlled trial, 60 patients, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists’ (ASA) physical status I–II, were randomized into three groups (n=20 per group). All patients were administered ropivacaine (15 mg) for spinal anaesthesia. Intravenous dexmedetomidine was administered in Group D (1 µg/kg loading dose over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion (0.5 µg/kg/hr), intravenous midazolam was administered in Group M (0.05 mg/kg) loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion (0.02 mg/kg/hr) and normal saline was infused in Group C. Intraoperative haemodynamic changes, onset, level and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, level of sedation, postoperative analgesia and side effects were recorded. Results: Heart rate was seen to fall significantly in Group D patients for the first 15 minutes. Measurements of mean blood pressure revealed significant decrease in Group D after 40 minutes, whereas the fall in Group C occurred after 15 minutes. Duration of sensory block was significantly longer in Group D patients (208±19.358 mins) as compared to Group M and C where the duration was (177±15.252 mins) and (177±17.800 mins) respectively. Higher levels of sedation were achieved in Group D and M where sedation score was 3 (fully asleep but arousable), 90% cases in Group D and 100% cases in Group M. The time at which first analgesic was given to patients (VAS score 4) was (271.50±21.831) in Group D and (202±25.047) in M and (218.50±38.013) in Group C. Dexmedetomidine significantly prolongs duration of analgesia providing pain relief in intraoperative and postoperative period. Injection of diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscular was used as rescue analgesic. The VAS score reached a value of 4 earlier in the midazolam and saline group than dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion: Intravenous dexmedetomidine prolonged spinal anaesthesia, though midazolam did not. It also provided sedation and additional analgesia. Therefore, dexmedetomidine is appropriate during spinal anaesthesia, although heart rate needs to be monitored cautiously.

Authors and Affiliations

Balwinder Kaur Rekhi, Tejinderpal Kaur, Divya Arora, Pankaj Dugg

Keywords

Related Articles

Competency in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Effect of Training Program on Competency

ABSTRACT Introduction: Blood Pressure (BP) measurement is the basis of diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Automatic BP monitors are available for self-measurement of BP at home and it helps in adaptation of treatme...

Standardization and Quality Improvement of Laboratory Services in India: Need and Challenges

Abstract Quality is a subjective term – subjective with respect to individual and time. Quality concepts were introduced and implemented by industry during world war II. In health care system, these concepts were introdu...

Fever in a Young Female Patient-A Diagnostic Dilemma

ABSTRACT A young female patient on chronic steroid therapy developed Cytomegalovirus gastritis with suspected dissemination. With no other identifiable cause of immune suppression, diagnosis of this unlikely infection un...

Thoracic Sarcoidosis: Imaging with High Resolution Computed Tomography

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a disease of unknown aetiology that primarily affects the lungs. Clinical and radiological findings with demonstration of non caseating granulomas on pathology is utilised for diagnosing the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP333226
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23874.9344
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Balwinder Kaur Rekhi, Tejinderpal Kaur, Divya Arora, Pankaj Dugg (2017). Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine with Midazolam in Prolonging Spinal Anaesthesia with Ropivacaine. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(2), 1-4. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-333226