Comparison of isobaric levobupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A prospective randomized case control study

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction Isobaric levobupivacaine is now being investigated in spinal anesthesia owing to its better safety profile however the studies are sparse which show clinical efficacy of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine alone in its ED95 dose 125135mg for cesarean sections CS and its comparison with most commonly used regime of hyperbaric bupivacaine 10mgObjective and Methods 100 parturients undergoing CS in spinal anesthesia were randomized in two equal groups to receive either 125mg isobaric levobupivacaine group L or 10mg hyperbaric bupivacaine group B Sensory motor block characteristics onset extent and duration hemodynamic profile adverse effects and success rate of the two drugs were comparedResults All patients in both groups achieved target sensory level of T6 and Bromage score of 3 complete motor block hence no patient required anesthetic supplementation resulting in 100 success rate in both groups Sensory onset Time to T6 was significantly faster in group B 38081 min than in Group L 428104 min p 0011 Motor onset Time to B3 was also significantly faster in Group B 304069 than in group L 356063 p 00002 However this difference of 1 xssremovedConclusion Isobaric levobupivacaine 125mg can be used as an alternative to hyperbaric bupivacaine 10mg in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section as it offers effective sensory motor blockade with clinically comparable onset timeKeywords Isobaric levobupivacaine Hyperbaric bupivacaine Spinal anesthesia Caesarean section

Authors and Affiliations

Udita Naithani, Madhanmohan C, Megha Gupta, Virendra Verma, Pankaj Damor

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of classic laryngeal mask airway with nasogastric tube versus proseal laryngeal mask airway in adults undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Introduction: Supraglottic devices are in regular practice in India for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Repeated use of supraglottic devices lead to risk of malfunction (herniation of cuff, inadequate seal) and transmissib...

Comparison of Ketamine versus Fentanyl as an adjuvant with Propofol for inserting Laryngeal Mask Airway

Materials and Methods: 120 adult, ASA 1 and 2 patients were randomly allocated into two groups, propofol-ketamine (PK) and propofol-fentanyl (PF), (n=60 in each group) Baseline parameters- oxygen saturation (SpO2), Mean...

A prospective randomized double blind study to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on intubating conditions during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided intubation

Introduction Various drugs have been used for sedation to provide adequate intubating conditions during awake fiberoptic intubation AFOI but these drugs may cause excessive sedation followed by respiratory depression whi...

Comparing efficacy of epidural dexamethasone versus fentanyl on post operative analgesia – a double blinded randomized study

Introduction: Various techniques and drugs have been adopted to prolong postoperative analgesia. Epidural steroids have been used successfully for long time for chronic pain syndrome. The safety of epidural steroids is w...

Comparison of oxygenation and ventilation parameters between proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a prospective observational study

Introduction Use of endotracheal tube ETT has many limitations There is a need for an airway device with similar safety and good side effect profile In this prospective observational study the oxygenation and ventilation...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP476510
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0104
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Udita Naithani, Madhanmohan C, Megha Gupta, Virendra Verma, Pankaj Damor (2018). Comparison of isobaric levobupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A prospective randomized case control study. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 5(4), 549-555. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-476510