Comparison of models for the physiological estimation of internal mechanical power in cycling

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2013, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Physiological models for estimating internal mechanical power (IP) generally share a common basis: the sum of IP and the external mechanical power (EP) is equal to the total mechanical power, as represented by net VO2. While a biomechanical perspective of IP argues against this simple summation, physiological models serve a valuable purpose because they account for the total flow of energy through the system. Despite their common foundation, estimates of IP using various physiological models have not been consistent. Two pre-existing models that use a physiological approach, as well as variations of them and a simple body mass-cadence relationship, were applied to submaximal data from eight well-trained male cyclists. Three incremental cycling tests were performed at cadences of 50-55, 80-85 and 110-115 rev • min-1. Differences in the mean and limits of agreement were used to show that values of IP calculated using two previously described models were not similar at any of the cadences tested. It was also shown that using relevant energy equivalents for converting VO2 into metabolic power produced smaller values for IP than when using a generic energy equivalent. Differences in values for IP in the published literature, therefore, might not necessarily be caused by differences in participant characteristics, but rather differences in the accuracy of the variables that are input into the IP models.

Authors and Affiliations

Hedda P Brooks*| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia.School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia, Mark H Andrews| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia., Adrian J Gray| Exercise & Sports Science, School of Science & Technology, University of New England, Mark A Osborne| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia.School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia

Keywords

Related Articles

The effects of block training periodization on pacing during 20-km cycling time trial

Several studies have been proposed to accumulate consecutive days (5 to 14 days) of high intensity interval training (HIT) to rapidly enhance physiological indexes, alpine sky performance and cycling performance. The co...

Impact of Cycling Intensity on Cycle-run Transition in Female Triathletes

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of intensity during the final km of a cycling bout on subsequent run and overall cycle-run (CR) performance. A secondary aim of the study was to examine how...

The effect of bicycle seat-tube angle on muscle activation of lower extremity

Purpose: This study recruited bicycle enthusiasts and investigated lower extremity muscle activation at various seat-tube angles. Methods: Twenty healthy participants (10 males and 10 females) with right dominant leg wer...

Effects of changing seat height on bike handling

Background: According to the Statistical Release by the Department for Transport, in the United Kingdom 19.000 cyclists are killed or seriously injured every year, with losing control being one of the most common reasons...

Conservative Management for a Traumatic Cervical Spine Cycling Injury

Competitive cycling holds an inherent risk of traumatic injury often resulting in fracture. Questions regarding the probability of return to sport then arise. The purpose of this case report is to describe the treatment...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2816
  • DOI -
  • Views 375
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Hedda P Brooks*, Mark H Andrews, Adrian J Gray, Mark A Osborne (2013). Comparison of models for the physiological estimation of internal mechanical power in cycling. Journal of Science and Cycling, 2(1), 58-66. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2816