Comparison of models for the physiological estimation of internal mechanical power in cycling

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2013, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Physiological models for estimating internal mechanical power (IP) generally share a common basis: the sum of IP and the external mechanical power (EP) is equal to the total mechanical power, as represented by net VO2. While a biomechanical perspective of IP argues against this simple summation, physiological models serve a valuable purpose because they account for the total flow of energy through the system. Despite their common foundation, estimates of IP using various physiological models have not been consistent. Two pre-existing models that use a physiological approach, as well as variations of them and a simple body mass-cadence relationship, were applied to submaximal data from eight well-trained male cyclists. Three incremental cycling tests were performed at cadences of 50-55, 80-85 and 110-115 rev • min-1. Differences in the mean and limits of agreement were used to show that values of IP calculated using two previously described models were not similar at any of the cadences tested. It was also shown that using relevant energy equivalents for converting VO2 into metabolic power produced smaller values for IP than when using a generic energy equivalent. Differences in values for IP in the published literature, therefore, might not necessarily be caused by differences in participant characteristics, but rather differences in the accuracy of the variables that are input into the IP models.

Authors and Affiliations

Hedda P Brooks*| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia.School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia, Mark H Andrews| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia., Adrian J Gray| Exercise & Sports Science, School of Science & Technology, University of New England, Mark A Osborne| Queensland Academy of Sport, Australia.School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia

Keywords

Related Articles

Low dose fish oil increases the omega-3 index improving cycling efficiency and heart rate recovery

Background: Dietary fish oil provides long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n-3 PUFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The heart (Charnock et al., 1986: Annals of Nutrition and Met...

Changes in whole body and local muscle oxygen consumption during prolonged cycling

Background: Cycling efficiency is a measure of the power output to power input and is a key determinant of cycling performance (Hopker et al., 2013: Journal of Applied Physiology, 115, 723-729). However, the determinants...

Individualising training intensity to reduce inter-individual variability in training response in trained cyclists

Training to improve endurance performance commonly results in large inter-individual variability (IIV) in response (Bouchard et al. [1998]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(2), 252–258; Mann et al. [2014]....

Wearable multi-sensor system for embedded body position and motion analysis during cycling

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the AREM system in laboratory conditions. AREM is an embedded electronic system for motion tracking and movement analysis, based on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEM...

The relationship between vertical leg stiffness and gross mechanical efficiency in cyclists

Background: Professional cyclists have been shown to have a mechanical efficiency that is 11% higher compared to amateur cyclists (Coyle et al. 1991: Med Sci Sports Exerc, 23 (1), 93-107). The variations in power between...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2816
  • DOI -
  • Views 435
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Hedda P Brooks*, Mark H Andrews, Adrian J Gray, Mark A Osborne (2013). Comparison of models for the physiological estimation of internal mechanical power in cycling. Journal of Science and Cycling, 2(1), 58-66. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2816