Comparison of Multiple-Choice Questions in Quality Parameters of Pediatric Residency Tests between the Pre-Board Examination of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and National Board Examination in 2007 and 2011

Journal Title: Research and Development in Medical Education - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) quality parameters of pediatric residency tests between the pre-board examinations of Tabriz University of Medical Science (TUMS), Tabriz, Iran and the national board examination in 2007 and 2011. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the format of 300 MCQs in the pre-board examination of TUMS and the format of 300 MCQs of the national board examination in pediatric residency. Individual MCQs were evaluated for content budgeting according to the Nelson pediatric residency reference textbook, taxonomy levels (Bloom’s levels I, II and III) and following structural principles (based on Millman checklist). Data were analyzed by SPSS (version 18) software. Results: We find more consistent content budgeting in the national board MCQ examinations. Forty one percent of pre-board MCQ examinations and 72% of national board MCQ examinations were Bloom’s taxonomy levels II -III (P=0.000). We found correct structural principles in 69.2% and 76.2% of pre-board and national board MCQs examinations, respectively (P=0.05). 30.7% and 22.5% of pre-board and national board MCQs examinations were negative stem, respectively (P=0.025). Most of the negative stem MCQs were Bloom’s taxonomy level I questions. Conclusion: Pediatric residency pre-board MCQ examinations of TUMS were of a significantly lower level of learning (taxonomy level I) compared to the national board MCQ examinations. To prevent low quality development of internal university examinations, monitoring of these exams is recommended.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohammad Barzegar, Nemat Bilan, Mohammad Hassan Karegar Maher, Siamak Shiva, Manizheh Sayyah Melli, Aydin Tabrizi

Keywords

Related Articles

What is the Best Evidence Medical Education?

Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) is defined as: “The implementation by teachers and educational bodies in their practice, of methods and approaches to education based on the best evidence available.” Five steps hav...

E-Readiness Assessment at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

Introduction: E-readiness assessment is the evaluation of one’s ability to accept and use information technologies and their relevant applications. E-readiness assessment helps us identify and study the strengths and wea...

Medical Students’ View about the Effects of Practical Courses on Learning the General Theoretical Concepts of Basic Medical Sciences

Introduction: The basic medical sciences section requires 2.5 years in the medical education curriculum. Practical courses complement theoretical knowledge in this period to improve their appreciation. Despite spending l...

Editorial: Research and Development in Medical Education

In recent years, medical education development has been significantly improved in Iran. More than 10 medical education journals are published periodi-cally in Persian. Annual national conference which has been held for 1...

Professional Identity Development in Nursing Students: Eisner’s Evaluation Model

Introduction: Professional identity development is one of the main concerns of nursing education. This study aimed to evaluate effective educational components on nursing students’ professional identity using Eisner’s mo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP99667
  • DOI 10.5681/rdme.2014.008
  • Views 173
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohammad Barzegar, Nemat Bilan, Mohammad Hassan Karegar Maher, Siamak Shiva, Manizheh Sayyah Melli, Aydin Tabrizi (2014). Comparison of Multiple-Choice Questions in Quality Parameters of Pediatric Residency Tests between the Pre-Board Examination of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and National Board Examination in 2007 and 2011. Research and Development in Medical Education, 3(1), 31-36. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-99667