COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LEVOSULPIRIDE AND ITOPRIDE IN TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common condition caused by reflux of the liquid acidic contents of the stomach into the oesophagus. Prokinetic medications can be used to treat or control the disease. Such medications can have mild-toserious adverse effects. Levosulpiride and itopride are two such medications, which are used for treating GERD. The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of levosulpiride and itopride in the management of GERD and to study the side effects and treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total 210 patients aged 18 to 90 years, 99 males and 111 females (male:female ratio of 1:1.1) with reflux oesophagitis were divided into three groups and an endoscopy test was done before starting treatment. The control group received rabeprazole and the two test groups received levosulpiride and itopride. Clinical adverse events were recorded at the end of week 1 and week 2. Following treatment, relief of symptoms was assessed at the end of 2 weeks. RESULTS There were total 210 patients (99 males and 111 females). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.1. GERD was more common in the 31-50 year age group. Most common symptoms were of dyspepsia, regurgitation, vomiting and heartburn. Improvement of symptoms during the treatment was seen in 53% levosulpiride and 41% itopride patients, respectively. The main adverse effects were abdominal pain and nausea. The percentage of nausea was high with itopride than levosulpiride. CONCLUSION Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common problem frequently seen in both genders and in younger people. Symptomatic relief and endoscopic recovery is early with levosulpiride than itopride. Levosulpiride gives better quality of life earlier in the treatment than itopride and has lesser side effects and better healing outcome.

Authors and Affiliations

Syed Ibrahim Hassan, Syed Mohd Akbar Hassan

Keywords

Related Articles

VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS IN PATIENTS OF TUBERCULOSIS ON ETHAMBUTOL

BACKGROUND Ethambutol causes retrobulbar neuritis that is related to the dose and duration of treatment, hence we undertook a prospective study of optic nerve function in patients on ethambutol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thi...

STUDY OF TREATMENT OF FRACTURE SHAFT OF LONG BONE OF LOWER LIMB IN CHILDREN BY TITANIUM ELASTIC NAIL (TENS)

BACKGROUND Management of displaced fracture shaft of femur and tibia in children between 3-13 yrs. is still a grey area. Although, conservative treatment provides excellent remodeling ability of immature bone in children...

A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY ON THE PROFILE OF FOOD ALLERGY AMONG PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC URTICARIA IN KERALA

BACKGROUND Skin allergy in the form of urticaria is commonly encountered. Food allergy is one of the common aetiologies responsible for this clinical situation. Identifying the offending allergens and avoidance is one of...

CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION OF LYMHADENOPATHY IN HIV POSITIVE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenopathy is common in HIV infected individuals as lymphoid tissue is a major target and reservoir of the Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well for opportunistic infections. AIM: Clinical assessmen...

OBSERVATION ON INCREASE IN WEIGHT OF LOW BIRTH WEIGHT (LBW) BABIES BY IMPLEMENTING KANGAROO MOTHER CARE (KMC) TECHNIQUE

Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) is a practical technique for nursing of low birth weight babies by direct skin to contact with the mother. This study was undertaken to observe and record the effect of KMC with focus on increa...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213496
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/55
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Syed Ibrahim Hassan, Syed Mohd Akbar Hassan (2017). COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LEVOSULPIRIDE AND ITOPRIDE IN TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(6), 292-297. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213496