COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LEVOSULPIRIDE AND ITOPRIDE IN TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE

Journal Title: Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common condition caused by reflux of the liquid acidic contents of the stomach into the oesophagus. Prokinetic medications can be used to treat or control the disease. Such medications can have mild-toserious adverse effects. Levosulpiride and itopride are two such medications, which are used for treating GERD. The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of levosulpiride and itopride in the management of GERD and to study the side effects and treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total 210 patients aged 18 to 90 years, 99 males and 111 females (male:female ratio of 1:1.1) with reflux oesophagitis were divided into three groups and an endoscopy test was done before starting treatment. The control group received rabeprazole and the two test groups received levosulpiride and itopride. Clinical adverse events were recorded at the end of week 1 and week 2. Following treatment, relief of symptoms was assessed at the end of 2 weeks. RESULTS There were total 210 patients (99 males and 111 females). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.1. GERD was more common in the 31-50 year age group. Most common symptoms were of dyspepsia, regurgitation, vomiting and heartburn. Improvement of symptoms during the treatment was seen in 53% levosulpiride and 41% itopride patients, respectively. The main adverse effects were abdominal pain and nausea. The percentage of nausea was high with itopride than levosulpiride. CONCLUSION Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common problem frequently seen in both genders and in younger people. Symptomatic relief and endoscopic recovery is early with levosulpiride than itopride. Levosulpiride gives better quality of life earlier in the treatment than itopride and has lesser side effects and better healing outcome.

Authors and Affiliations

Syed Ibrahim Hassan, Syed Mohd Akbar Hassan

Keywords

Related Articles

ANALYSIS OF DONOR CORNEA RETRIEVAL DATA- HOSPITAL AND RESIDENCES

BACKGROUND The voluntary eye donation is still the most popular methods of eye donation in our country. Since last three decades, the voluntary eye donation is promoted by a number of NGOs and Government of India. The me...

THE STUDY ON STROKE IN HIV PATIENTS

BACKGROUND Stroke and HIV infection are both common medical problems in day-to-day clinical practice. According to the few studies done1 in India, the prevalence of stroke in general population in India is 205 cases/1 la...

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF PROPOFOL AND DEXMEDETOMIDINE TO REDUCE SEVOFLURANE INDUCED EMERGENCE AGITATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN UNDERGOING DAY CARE SURGERY

BACKGROUND In children Sevoflurane is associated with delirium upon recovery from anaesthesia, cause is not clear. It is called emergence delirium or emergence agitation. This is usually seen in first thirty minutes and...

EFFECTS OF VARYING PERIODS OF PRE-OXYGENATION ON INTRAOPERATIVE OXYGEN SATURATION AND ITS HEMODYNAMIC EFFECT ON HEALTHY ASA I AND II CLASS PATIENTS- A TERTIARY CARE EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND Pre-oxygenation with 100% oxygen is performed routinely before induction of anaesthesia. The purpose of pre-oxygenation is to increase the body oxygen stores and to replace nitrogen in the lungs by an equivale...

DETERMINANTS OF BAD OUTCOME IN SPINAL INJURIES- A CASE CONTROL STUDY

BACKGROUND Craniospinal injuries are most important cause of mortality and long-term morbidity. There are no studies in our setup to develop a protocol for management of craniospinal injury victims, their transportation,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP213496
  • DOI 10.18410/jebmh/2017/55
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Syed Ibrahim Hassan, Syed Mohd Akbar Hassan (2017). COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LEVOSULPIRIDE AND ITOPRIDE IN TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 4(6), 292-297. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-213496