Comparison of Skull Dimension and Geometric Formulas Method to Solve Projection Errors in 2D Cephalometric Radiographs

Journal Title: Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Two dimensional (2D) cephalometry showed projection errors of mandibular curved structures which led to inaccuracies in landmark measurements. Objective: To create geometric formulas for ramal height and mandibular corpus length and test the validity of these hypothetical geometric formulas in comparison to the actual skull measurements to solve the problems of projection errors. Material and Methods: Twenty-two skulls were included in the study. Two-dimensional(2D) cephalometric films which include Lateral (1), Postero-anterior (2) and Submento vertex (3) were taken for each skull. The actual measurements of ramal height (Co-Go), mandibular corpus lengths (Go-Me) and total mandibular lengths were obtained directly from the skull. 2D measurements were obtained from 3 views of 2D cephalometric films. Based on 3-dimensional co-ordinate axis (X, Y, Z), geometric formulas were constructed using variables from multiple 2D films to calculate ramal height (R) and mandibular corpus length (M). Validity of these formulas were tested with matched pair T-test statistics by comparing with the direct skull measurements. Results: All 2D cephalometric mandibular measurements were significantly shorter than direct skull measurements. The average ramal height and mandibular corpus lengths measured from Lateral cephalometry was 1.27mm. (SD 0.97) and 17.64mm. (SD 2.12) shorter than actual skull measurements. Geometric formulas significantly reduced mean difference between values from 2D cephalometrics and skull measurements. Most valid formulas for ramal height and mandibular corpus length were √YR12+ ZR32+ XR22 and √M12+XM22 respectively. Cephalometry is one of the indispensable diagnostic tools in orthodontics for diagnosis of dentofacial problems, growth evaluation, treatment planning and outcome evaluation [1,2]. However, the most highlighted drawback still remains the representation of three-dimensional (3D) structures in twodimensional (2D) axis, leading to projection distortion, positional distortion, image magnification, landmark identification error, superimposition of structures which has partly frustrated clinicians particularly in the aspect of treatment evaluation [2- 4]. To overcome the drawbacks of 2D projection, Adams invented a correction formula for image enlargement and distortion [5]. Similarly, a compensator for lateral films was developed by Wylie and Elsasser which was later modified by Vogel to include PosteroAnterior (PA) cephalograms [6,7]. Savara also introduced a method to measure landmarks in three-dimension using lateral and PA cephalograms [8]. Additionally, in an attempt to combine the use of lateral and PA films together, Broadbent and Bolton introduced “Broadbent Orientator” which was an acetate overlay of lateral and PA film registered at Frankfort horizontal plane [1]. Additionally, Buamrind, et al.[9]. attempted to combine the use of two coplanar films based on the principle of photo-stereometry.

Authors and Affiliations

Ugyen Phuntsho, Julalak Komoltri, Nita Viwattanatipa

Keywords

Related Articles

Successful use of Ustekinumab in a Patient with Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case report and Review of literature

Studies have demonstrated the role of TH-17 pathway in the pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody, binds and inhibits p40 subunit of IL-12 and 23, leading to IL-17 blockage...

RNA as A Potent Target for Antibacterial Drug Discovery

The development of novel antibiotics is becoming a real emergency due to the growing number of multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. This is also a global problem due to mass production and application of various anti...

A Coinheritance of X-Linked and Autosomal Dominant forms of the Ichthyosis

According to a modern classification, there are two forms of inherited ichthyosises: syndromic and nonsyndromic, each of them consists of more than ten different nosologies [1]. More common types of the ichthyosis are X-...

Various Improved Approximations to Distributions of Quadratic Test Statistics for Dependent Rank Sums

This paper presents a modified chi-square approximation to the distribution of test statistics arising from multivariate ranked data. The modification arises from an improvement to the estimated variance matrix of the re...

Protein Content of Dr Alcaraz Y Col Protocol for ObtainingPlasma Growth Factors in 350 Healthy Patients andComparison with Other Methods Published in Literature

Introduction: The diversity of procedures for obtaining platelet and plasmatic growth factors, the absence of control in most of them and the growing field of clinical application, makes them necessary methods adequately...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP586019
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.12.002201
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ugyen Phuntsho, Julalak Komoltri, Nita Viwattanatipa (2018). Comparison of Skull Dimension and Geometric Formulas Method to Solve Projection Errors in 2D Cephalometric Radiographs. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 12(1), 8982-8993. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-586019