Comparison of Two Different Central Venous Access Device Insertion Techniques: No Evil in Details

Journal Title: HASEKİ TIP BÜLTENİ - Year 2019, Vol 57, Issue 1

Abstract

Aim: Central venous access devices (CVADs) have been used for prolonged infusion chemotherapy and have facilitated the problem of vascular access. The aims of this study were to analyse the results and complications of two CVAD implantation techniques. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 118 implantable venous access devices inserted via the subclavian vein using two different surgical techniques between January 2015 and June 2017 in İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of General Surgery. While the devices were placed under fluoroscopic guidance in group 1, they were placed without fluoroscopy in group 2. All procedures were performed under sedation and local anesthesia. All devices were placed at the anterior chest wall over the pectoralis fascia. Outcome and complications were followed and recorded elaborately. Results: A total of 118 venous access devices were implanted. During follow-up, a total of eight complications were observed. Pneumothorax was observed in five, wound infection in two and catheter fracture was observed in one patient. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups. Conclusion: CVADs increase quality of life of patients with oncologic diseases during chemotherapy. Common periprocedural complications of CVADs are pneumothorax, wound infection and catheter occlusion. In critical patients, the use of fluoroscopy may be helpful in reducing complications. However, since fluoroscopy increases costs and requires experience, CVAD insertion under fluoroscopy guidance may not always be possible. There is also a risk of radiation exposure when using fluoroscopy. In regard to comparison of the two techniques, fluoroscopy guidance did not alter the results and its superiority over the other technique was not observed. Although image-guided insertion of subcutaneous chest ports has advantages over unguided insertion, the latter can be used in a selected group of patients in experienced hands.

Authors and Affiliations

Mürşit Dinçer, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Adnan Hut, Ümit Gür, Gamze Çıtlak, Muzaffer Akıncı

Keywords

Related Articles

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in 263 Cases: A Retrospective Study

Aim: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly being used worldwide. In this study, we reviewed our early experiences with the use of uVATS in the treatment and the diagnosis of various thora...

Vaccination Rates in Geriatric Outpatient Clinic in Gaziantep Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital

Aim: Vaccination against influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) is recommended for older adults. Data on vaccination rates in older adults are limited for our cou...

Role of Peritoneal Ultrafiltration in Heart Failure Treatment

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a general term that can reflect different clinical conditions in which cardiac and renal dysfunctions coexist. The main pathogenetic mechanisms playing a role in heart failure (HF) and CRS a...

Effect of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in the Development of Antibiotic Resistance in Children with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections

2017-04-05Aim:­Although prophylactic antibiotic treatment is still debatable, it is currently in use in recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). In the present study, we aimed to observe if prophylactic antibiotic use...

Intravesical Migration of Intrauterine Device: A Report of Cases of Total and Partial Migration

Intrauterine devices (IUD) are the commonly used long-acting, reversible and effective method of contraception. Migration of IUD into the bladder via uterine perforation is a very rare complication. In this paper, we aim...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP541374
  • DOI 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4459
  • Views 83
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mürşit Dinçer, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Adnan Hut, Ümit Gür, Gamze Çıtlak, Muzaffer Akıncı (2019). Comparison of Two Different Central Venous Access Device Insertion Techniques: No Evil in Details. HASEKİ TIP BÜLTENİ, 57(1), 9-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-541374