Comparison Study of Indonesia and France Judicial Commission Model

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the comparative study of the Indonesian State Judicial Commission and the French State Judicial Commission. In the analysis, the normative analysis method is used by observing inferior information because it emphasizes more on research from various legal books, journals and previous research literature. The results of this study are the Judicial Commission even though its position is supporting to the judicial authority body. The authority of the Judicial Commission in court is not as one who decides on a case but as an enforcement agency for ethical norms. In the field of judges, the Judicial Commission is not involved in terms of organization, personnel, administration and finance. Related to this, the Judicial Commission is different from those in European countries, for example France. The Judicial Commission in France (Conseil Superieur de la Magistrature or CSM) has authority in specific areas based on technical policies and policy-making on the judicial aspect. The French Judicial Commission as well as in Europe usually has authority regarding agency management, calculation and administration of justice including in carrying out advertisements, transfers, recruitment and distributing rewards to judges. The authority of the Supreme Court is an institution that carries out the functions of the judiciary and its duties are related to adjudicating and not dealing with matters related to the administration and organization of justice.

Authors and Affiliations

Hanif Hardianto, Nina Farliana

Keywords

Related Articles

Prevalence of Dental Caries and Related Factors among Patients Attending Dental Clinics in Dentistry Department - Hilla University College, Iraq

Background: Dental caries is the most common dental health problem caused by bacteria that affecting the teeth of huge population worldwide. Many factors are contribute in the prevalence and evolution of caries, such as...

Effect of Corporate Governance on Financial Distress: Evidence from Listed Firms at Ghana Stock Exchange

This study was conducted to determine the effect of corporate governance on financial distress of listed firms at Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) using panel data from 2015 to 2019. Specifically, the study focusses on: The ef...

The Effect of Independence, Learning Quality, And Learning Motivation on Swimming Learning Outcomes

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of independence, learning quality and learning motivation on swimming learning outcomes. The research sample was 30 participants in the Telaga Bestari Swimming Pool C...

A Comprehensive Healthcare Model: Dimension, Status, and Approach

According to the WHO definition, health as a state of physical, mental and social integrity, not just the absence of disease, the truly healthy (first state) and patients (third state) are less than 25%, and 75% of the p...

Development of a Google Maps-Based Website for Information on Football Goalkeeper Coach Services in the Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta

Football is one of the sports that is most in demand by the Indonesian people, especially teenagers. Where there are many football championships both in regional and national matches. So that well-known clubs that are ha...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP713559
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i2-38
  • Views 58
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hanif Hardianto, Nina Farliana (2023). Comparison Study of Indonesia and France Judicial Commission Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(02), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-713559