Comparison Study of Indonesia and France Judicial Commission Model

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the comparative study of the Indonesian State Judicial Commission and the French State Judicial Commission. In the analysis, the normative analysis method is used by observing inferior information because it emphasizes more on research from various legal books, journals and previous research literature. The results of this study are the Judicial Commission even though its position is supporting to the judicial authority body. The authority of the Judicial Commission in court is not as one who decides on a case but as an enforcement agency for ethical norms. In the field of judges, the Judicial Commission is not involved in terms of organization, personnel, administration and finance. Related to this, the Judicial Commission is different from those in European countries, for example France. The Judicial Commission in France (Conseil Superieur de la Magistrature or CSM) has authority in specific areas based on technical policies and policy-making on the judicial aspect. The French Judicial Commission as well as in Europe usually has authority regarding agency management, calculation and administration of justice including in carrying out advertisements, transfers, recruitment and distributing rewards to judges. The authority of the Supreme Court is an institution that carries out the functions of the judiciary and its duties are related to adjudicating and not dealing with matters related to the administration and organization of justice.

Authors and Affiliations

Hanif Hardianto, Nina Farliana

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effect of Playing Method and Cooperative Learning Method of Team Games Tournament Type on Learning Outcomes of Passing and Shooting Skills in Football Games

This study aims to determine whether playing method and cooperative learning method affect the learning outcomes of passing and shooting skills in football games. This research used a quantitative methodology with an exp...

Cephalometric Evaluation of Changes in Tongue Position, Posture and Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions Following Treatment of Angle’s Class 1 Bimaxillary Proclination

Objectives:The aim of the study is to determine and correlate the effects of anterior teeth retraction on tongue position, posture and pharyngeal airway dimensions, in Angle’s Class 1 bimaxillary dentoalveolar proclinati...

Consciousness Price, Store Image, and Variations in Quality Repurchase of Private Label Analysis

The purpose of this study was to prove the effect of Store Image, Price Consciousness, and Quality Variations Repurchase on Private Label, samples were taken using convenience sampling of 179 respondents and data collect...

The Effectiveness of LKPD Mobile Learning on the PBL Model of Environmental Change Material to Increase Interest in Learning and Critical Thinking of Grade X High School Students

This study aims to find out: (1) the effectiveness of LKPD mobile learning model problem-based learning on environmental change material used to increase the learning interest of grade X high school students; (2) the eff...

Researching the Factors Affecting the Engagement of Employees with the Organization at Mobio Vietnam Software Application Joint Stock Company

This research was conducted to evaluate the factors influencing the engagement of employees with the organization at Mobio Vietnam Software Application Joint Stock Company by surveying the employees. Cronbach's alpha, EF...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP713559
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i2-38
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hanif Hardianto, Nina Farliana (2023). Comparison Study of Indonesia and France Judicial Commission Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(02), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-713559