Competition Law and State Aid for Failing Banks in the EU and its Specific Implications for CEE Member States

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 14

Abstract

The bank bailouts following the global financial crisis of 2008 have been subject to prior approval of the European Commission (EC), the competition authority of the European Union. The EC was reluctant to reject rescue efforts directed at failing banks and so it consistently approved all such requests submitted by Member States. Out of the top twenty European banks, the EC authorized State aid to at least twelve entities. In this context, the paper outlines the gradually changing interpretation of EU State aid rules, the “temporary and extraordinary rules” introduced starting from late 2008, and the extension of the “no-State aid” category. The above shifts show that the EC itself deflected from relevant EU laws in order to systemically rescue important banks in Europe and restore their financial stability. The paper argues that bank bailouts and bank rescue packages by the State have led to different effects on market structures and consumer welfare in the Eurozone and non-Eurozone areas, mostly the Eastern segments of the European Union. As such, it is argued that they are inconsistent with the European common market. Although the EC tried to minimize the distortion of competition created as aresult of the aforementioned case law primarily through the application of the principle of exceptionality and different compensation measures, these efforts have been at least partially unsuccessful.Massive State aid packages, the preferential treatment of the largest, or systemically important, banks through EU State aid mechanisms – almost none of which are Central and Eastern European (CEE) – may have led to the distortion of competition on the common market. That is so mainly because of the prioritization of the stability of the financial sector and the Euro. The paper argues that State aid for failing banks may have had important positive effects in the short run, such as the promotion of the stability of the banking system and the Euro. In the longrun however, it has contributed to the unprecedented sovereign indebtedness in Europe, and contributed to an increased economic and political instability of the EU, particularly in its most vulnerable CEE segment.

Authors and Affiliations

Virág Blazsek

Keywords

Related Articles

The Principle of Liability in Private Antitrust Enforcement in Selected European States in Light of the Implementation of the Damages Directive into the Polish Legal System

In the vast majority of European countries, private antitrust enforcement falls under general rules of civil law. One of the issues to be discussed in relation to this type of litigation is the principle of liability, wh...

The Regulatory Consumer in EU and National Law? Case Study of the Normative Concept of the Consumer in Hungary and Poland

This paper analyzes the question how EU and national laws implemented and how courts and regulatory authorities apply two opposing regulatory approaches and the corresponding legally defined images of consumers in market...

Fifth National Academic Conference ‘Consumer in the Rail Passenger Market’, Łódź, 9 May 2018

On 9 May 2018, the Fifth National Academic Conference ‘Consumer in the Rail Passenger Market’ was held at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Łódź (WPiA UŁ). The event was organised by the Student...

The Judicial Review of the Standard of Proof in Cartel Cases:Raising the Bar for the Croatian Competition AuthorityCase comment to the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia No. U-III-2791/2016 of 1 February 2018 (Sokol Marićd.o.o.)

The Security agencies case represents another example of the procedural diversity among Member States in applying national competition rules that mirror Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In its infringement decision the Croatia...

Selectivity in Fiscal Aids: Recent Developments

The notion of fiscal aid is becoming crucial in determining the relationship between supra-national integration and national tax sovereignty; the selectivity criterion is often key in the assessment of compatibility of f...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP320135
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.6
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Virág Blazsek (2016). Competition Law and State Aid for Failing Banks in the EU and its Specific Implications for CEE Member States. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 9(14), 145-158. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-320135