Composition as identity and plural Cantor's theorem

Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 3

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the thesis of Composition as Identity blocks the plural version of Cantor’s Theorem, and that this in turn has implications for our use of Cantor’s theorem in metaphysics. As an example, I show how this result blocks a recent argument by Hawthorne and Uzquiano, and might be turned around to become an abductive argument for Composition as Identity

Authors and Affiliations

Einar Duenger

Keywords

Related Articles

Composition as identity and plural Cantor's theorem

In this paper, I argue that the thesis of Composition as Identity blocks the plural version of Cantor’s Theorem, and that this in turn has implications for our use of Cantor’s theorem in metaphysics. As an example, I sho...

The Need for Pluralism of Causality

It will be shown in this article that a pluralism of causality is needed. Not only, as might be expected, for such different domains as natural sciences and humanities, but even within the domain of physics different cau...

Sequents for non-wellfounded mereology

The paper explores the proof theory of non-wellfounded mereology with binary fusions and provides a cut-free sequent calculus equivalent to the standard axiomatic system.

Category Free Category Theory and Its Philosophical Implications

There exists a dispute in philosophy, going back at least to Leibniz, whether is it possible to view the world as a network of relations and relations between relations with the role of objects, between which these relat...

Mereology and Infinity

This paper deals with the treatment of infinity and finiteness in mereology. After an overview of some first-order mereological theories, finiteness axioms are introduced along with a mereological definition of “x is fin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP202178
  • DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.009
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Einar Duenger (2016). Composition as identity and plural Cantor's theorem. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 25(3), 411-428. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-202178