Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences

Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 1

Abstract

All who teach logic are familiar with informal fallacies such as ad ignorantium (appeal to ignorance) and ad populum (appeal to popularity). While it is easy to give clear examples of poor reasoning of this sort, instructors are also cognizant of what might be called “exceptions”: when it is legitimate to appeal to popularity or to an absence of evidence. The view I defend here is that appeals to popularity and ignorance (and some other fallacies) should best be viewed as instances of abductive reasoning, or inferences to the best explanation. Thus, determinations of whether these types of arguments are good ones will rest on the criteria that determine good reasoning for abductive arguments generally.

Authors and Affiliations

A. J. Kreider

Keywords

Related Articles

Composition, identity, and emergence

Composition as Identity (CAI) is the thesis that a whole is, strictly and literally, identical to its parts, considered collectively. McDaniel [2008] argues against CAI in that it prohibits emergent properties. Recently...

Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016

Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online)....

Errata Corrige to “Pragmatic and dialogic interpretation of bi-intuitionism. Part I”

The goal of [3] is to sketch the construction of a syntactic categorical model of the bi-intuitionistic logic of assertions and hypotheses AH, axiomatized in a sequent calculus AH-G1, and to show that such a model has a...

The mereology of structural universals

This paper explores the mereology of structural universals, using the structural richness of a non-classical mereology without unique fusions. The paper focuses on a problem posed by David Lewis, who using the example of...

Sequents for non-wellfounded mereology

The paper explores the proof theory of non-wellfounded mereology with binary fusions and provides a cut-free sequent calculus equivalent to the standard axiomatic system.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP201737
  • DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.001
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. J. Kreider (2016). Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 25(1), 73-82. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-201737