Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences

Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 1

Abstract

All who teach logic are familiar with informal fallacies such as ad ignorantium (appeal to ignorance) and ad populum (appeal to popularity). While it is easy to give clear examples of poor reasoning of this sort, instructors are also cognizant of what might be called “exceptions”: when it is legitimate to appeal to popularity or to an absence of evidence. The view I defend here is that appeals to popularity and ignorance (and some other fallacies) should best be viewed as instances of abductive reasoning, or inferences to the best explanation. Thus, determinations of whether these types of arguments are good ones will rest on the criteria that determine good reasoning for abductive arguments generally.

Authors and Affiliations

A. J. Kreider

Keywords

Related Articles

Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016

Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online)....

Relational semantics for the 4-valued relevant logics BN4 and E4

The logic BN4 was defined by R.T. Brady in 1982. It can be considered as the 4-valued logic of the relevant conditional. E4 is a variant of BN4 that can be considered as the 4-valued logic of (relevant) entailment. The a...

A Theory of Propositions

In this paper I present a new theory of propositions, according to which propositions are abstract mathematical objects: well-formed formulas together with models. I distinguish the theory from a number of existing views...

Composition as identity and plural Cantor's theorem

In this paper, I argue that the thesis of Composition as Identity blocks the plural version of Cantor’s Theorem, and that this in turn has implications for our use of Cantor’s theorem in metaphysics. As an example, I sho...

The lattice of Belnapian modal logics: Special extensions and counterparts

Let K be the least normal modal logic and BK its Belnapian version, which enriches K with ‘strong negation’. We carry out a systematic study of the lattice of logics containing BK based on: • introducing the classes (or...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP201737
  • DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.001
  • Views 82
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. J. Kreider (2016). Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 25(1), 73-82. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-201737