Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences
Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 1
Abstract
All who teach logic are familiar with informal fallacies such as ad ignorantium (appeal to ignorance) and ad populum (appeal to popularity). While it is easy to give clear examples of poor reasoning of this sort, instructors are also cognizant of what might be called “exceptions”: when it is legitimate to appeal to popularity or to an absence of evidence. The view I defend here is that appeals to popularity and ignorance (and some other fallacies) should best be viewed as instances of abductive reasoning, or inferences to the best explanation. Thus, determinations of whether these types of arguments are good ones will rest on the criteria that determine good reasoning for abductive arguments generally.
Authors and Affiliations
A. J. Kreider
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP201737
- DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.001
- Views 67
- Downloads 0
Refutation Systems for a System of Nonsense-Logic
In the paper rejection systems for a system of nonsense-logic are investigated. The first rejection system consists of four rejected axioms and only one rejection rule - the rule of rejection by detachment. The second o...
Composition, identity, and emergence
Composition as Identity (CAI) is the thesis that a whole is, strictly and literally, identical to its parts, considered collectively. McDaniel [2008] argues against CAI in that it prohibits emergent properties. Recently...
The Need for Pluralism of Causality
It will be shown in this article that a pluralism of causality is needed. Not only, as might be expected, for such different domains as natural sciences and humanities, but even within the domain of physics different cau...
Sequents for non-wellfounded mereology
The paper explores the proof theory of non-wellfounded mereology with binary fusions and provides a cut-free sequent calculus equivalent to the standard axiomatic system.
Aristotle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and What Does Not Exist
While nowhere does he use the term to refer to his own theory, Aristotle is often thought to exemplify an early correspondence theory of truth. In the paper, I examine the textual evidence used to support the idea that A...