Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences

Journal Title: Logic and Logical Philosophy - Year 2016, Vol 25, Issue 1

Abstract

All who teach logic are familiar with informal fallacies such as ad ignorantium (appeal to ignorance) and ad populum (appeal to popularity). While it is easy to give clear examples of poor reasoning of this sort, instructors are also cognizant of what might be called “exceptions”: when it is legitimate to appeal to popularity or to an absence of evidence. The view I defend here is that appeals to popularity and ignorance (and some other fallacies) should best be viewed as instances of abductive reasoning, or inferences to the best explanation. Thus, determinations of whether these types of arguments are good ones will rest on the criteria that determine good reasoning for abductive arguments generally.

Authors and Affiliations

A. J. Kreider

Keywords

Related Articles

Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Springer, 2016

Book Reviews: Can Başkent (ed.), Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Volume 8, Springer, 2016, vii + 197 pages, ISBN: 978-3-319-20761-2 (Print), 978-3-319-20762-9 (Online)....

Mereology and truth-making

Many mereological propositions are true contingently, so we are entitled to ask why they are true. One frequently given type of answer to such questions evokes truth-makers, that is, entities in virtue of whose existence...

Relational semantics for the 4-valued relevant logics BN4 and E4

The logic BN4 was defined by R.T. Brady in 1982. It can be considered as the 4-valued logic of the relevant conditional. E4 is a variant of BN4 that can be considered as the 4-valued logic of (relevant) entailment. The a...

Simple cut elimination proof for hybrid logic

In the paper we present a relatively simple proof of cut elimination theorem for variety of hybrid logics in the language with satisfaction operators and universal modality. The proof is based on the strategy introduced...

Aristotle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and What Does Not Exist

While nowhere does he use the term to refer to his own theory, Aristotle is often thought to exemplify an early correspondence theory of truth. In the paper, I examine the textual evidence used to support the idea that A...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP201737
  • DOI 10.12775/LLP.2016.001
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. J. Kreider (2016). Informal Fallacies as Abductive Inferences. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 25(1), 73-82. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-201737