Confiscation and special confiscation as possible consequence of corrupt offense

Abstract

The article deals with scientific and practical commentary of art. 69 of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" of October 14, 2014: additional arguments have been presented in favor of the exclusion of property confiscation as a form of punishment; there is delimitation of confiscation as a form of punishment, special confiscation as another criminal-legal measure and criminal-procedural confiscation. The conclusion has been made about the purely declarative nature of such criminal-legal measures because of problems of their application in case of committing a corruption crime. The author has stated that according to the court decision, in the manner established by law, funds and other property received as a result of the commitment of a corruption offense are subject to confiscation or special confiscation only in case of committing a corruption offense. Criminal procedural confiscation is a tool for disposing of evidence (Article 100 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine) is not relevant to criminal legal confiscation as a form of punishment or special confiscation as another measure of a criminal law nature. Confiscation as a form of additional punishment for a corruption crime commitment is possible only if it is directly foreseen in the sanction of the relevant article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (part 5 of article 191, part 3 of article 262, sections 2 and 3 of article 308, part 3 of the constitution) 312, part 3 of article 313, part 3 of article 3652, parts 3 and 4 of article 368, all 3 parts of article 3682, part 3 of article 3683, part 4 of article 3684, part 2 -4 articles 369 and part 3 of article 3692). Special confiscation as another measure of a criminal-legal nature is possible only in case of committing such corruption offenses as art. 313 "Abduction, appropriation, extortion of equipment intended for the manufacture of drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues, or theft to them by means of fraud or abuse of office and other illegal actions with such equipment", 3641 "Abuse of authority by an official of a legal entity of private law independently from the organizational-legal form", 3652"Abuse of authority by persons providing public services"of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (that is only for three crimes). Both of these measures are possible only if the court establishes the criminal origin of the relevant items.

Authors and Affiliations

Volodymyr Shablystyy

Keywords

Related Articles

European experience in critical infrastructure protection: legal analysis and perspectives of implementation in Ukraine

The analysis of European legislation in the field of critical infrastructure protection is carried out. The basic requirements for construction of a state control system of such a system are stated. The peculiarities of...

Classification of administrators of public service in judicial power

The article is devoted to questions of improvement of public service in bodies of judicial power. Attention is not given to a wide range of subjects that are empowered to administer public service in the judiciary. Their...

Tasks, directions and principles of personnel politics in the bodies of police of Ukraine

The article deals with research of basic parameters of personnel politics in the bodies of police of Ukraine and vital problems implementation of skilled politics of the National police of Ukraine and to the features of...

Theoretical applicable aspects of use of temporary access to items and documents

The necessity in the provisions of the current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine to justify the interpretation of the term "reasonable suspicion" has been substantiated, since it concerns all measures to ensure crimina...

Ensuring the electoral rights of internally displaced persons in local elections: problems of theory and practice

The article deals with the problems of implementing the electoral rights of internally displaced persons in Ukraine at local elections. The emphasis is also placed on guaranteeing the right to vote in local elections of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP510861
  • DOI 10.31733/2078-3566-2018-1-130-138
  • Views 102
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Volodymyr Shablystyy (2018). Confiscation and special confiscation as possible consequence of corrupt offense. Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav, 1(1), 130-138. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-510861