Confiscation and special confiscation as possible consequence of corrupt offense
Journal Title: Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 1
The article deals with scientific and practical commentary of art. 69 of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" of October 14, 2014: additional arguments have been presented in favor of the exclusion of property confiscation as a form of punishment; there is delimitation of confiscation as a form of punishment, special confiscation as another criminal-legal measure and criminal-procedural confiscation. The conclusion has been made about the purely declarative nature of such criminal-legal measures because of problems of their application in case of committing a corruption crime. The author has stated that according to the court decision, in the manner established by law, funds and other property received as a result of the commitment of a corruption offense are subject to confiscation or special confiscation only in case of committing a corruption offense. Criminal procedural confiscation is a tool for disposing of evidence (Article 100 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine) is not relevant to criminal legal confiscation as a form of punishment or special confiscation as another measure of a criminal law nature. Confiscation as a form of additional punishment for a corruption crime commitment is possible only if it is directly foreseen in the sanction of the relevant article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (part 5 of article 191, part 3 of article 262, sections 2 and 3 of article 308, part 3 of the constitution) 312, part 3 of article 313, part 3 of article 3652, parts 3 and 4 of article 368, all 3 parts of article 3682, part 3 of article 3683, part 4 of article 3684, part 2 -4 articles 369 and part 3 of article 3692). Special confiscation as another measure of a criminal-legal nature is possible only in case of committing such corruption offenses as art. 313 "Abduction, appropriation, extortion of equipment intended for the manufacture of drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues, or theft to them by means of fraud or abuse of office and other illegal actions with such equipment", 3641 "Abuse of authority by an official of a legal entity of private law independently from the organizational-legal form", 3652"Abuse of authority by persons providing public services"of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (that is only for three crimes). Both of these measures are possible only if the court establishes the criminal origin of the relevant items.
Authors and Affiliations
State of scientific development of problems of operational-search counteraction to crimes against public safety
The article analyzes the state of the scientific development of the problems of operational-search counteraction to crimes against public safety and identifies the main theoretical gaps that determine the expediency of i...
Areas of activity of service centers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine and classification of administrative services provided by them in the field of road safety
The article is devoted to the study of the content of the service centers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, the identification of areas of their activities in the field of road safety, as well as criteria f...
The issues of protection of the rights of victims (victims) of crime as one of the fundamental principles of criminal justice are considered. The provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from the point of...
In art. 264 of the Criminal Code establishes liability for negligent storage of firearms or ammunition, if this was the cause of death or other serious consequences. The norm is blanket disposition, i.e. to determine sig...
The system of sources regulating human and citizen rights in the European Union is considered; the peculiarities of the legal regulation of citizens' rights at the EU level are revealed; the types and studied the content...
How To Cite
Volodymyr Shablystyy (2018). Confiscation and special confiscation as possible consequence of corrupt offense. Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav, 1(1), 130-138. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-510861