CONTRADICTION OF FREEDOM AND PARADOXES OF RESPONSIBILITY (ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS)

Abstract

Purpose of the paper is to highlight the methodological role of social philosophy in the processes of optimizing the democratic system, modernizing the content of the category of freedom and responsibility ‑ through the philosophical analysis of definitions by representatives of various political forces and the humanities. The task is to reveal the causes of the ambiguity of the concept of democracy through the analysis of the polysemy of the notions of freedom and responsibility and to prevent the danger of the transformation of democracy into a dictatorship or ochlocracy. Theoretical basis is the fundamental research of prominent philosophers such as B. Spinoza, G. F. F. Hegel, G.-V. Leibniz, F. Nietzsche, J.-J. Russo, J.-P. Sartre, E. Fromm, M. Berdyaev and others; the basic principles of social philosophy ‑ social determinism, the concreteness of truth, rationality, interconnection and development, the requirements of comprehensiveness and criticism. Originality of the research is: in substantiating the significance of contemporary philosophical analysis of the content of key concepts of democracy ‑ «freedom» and «responsibility»; in revealing the mechanism of the functioning of concepts of freedom and responsibility in different ideologies and various spheres of public life; in conducting a philosophical analysis of the notion of responsibility, in revealing the reasons for the paradoxical nature of its manifestations; in outlining the scientific and didactic potential of the philosophical research of categories of freedom and responsibility in the practice of democratic processes; in posing the question of the need to take into account the hierarchy of the content of freedom (delineation of the word, concept, category). Conclusions. As a result of the study, it was found that the philosophical understanding of the basic principles and concepts of democracy, especially freedom and responsibility, must precede the optimization of the democratic system, and the results of philosophical analysis must be taken into account in the practice of everyday life of the state. The model of the constant reproduction of the existing state of spiritual differentiation of a person's worldview should be contrasted with the model of harmonization of the democratic system (which is an ideal), only reducing its internal contradiction to the non-antagonistic and the formation on this basis of self-limitation, self-determination of personalities ‑ as a consequence of understanding the relativity of freedom, full awareness and acceptance responsibility for their intentions and decisions.

Authors and Affiliations

Z. V. Stezhko, Y. G. Stezhko

Keywords

Related Articles

КОЭВОЛЮЦИОННАЯ СЕМАНТИКА ГЕНЕЗИСА ТЕХНОГЕННОЙ ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИИ И ЭВОЛЮЦИОННЫЙ РИСК (МЕЖДУ БИОЭСТЕТИКОЙ И БИОПОЛИТИКОЙ)

Целью (метазадачей) настоящей работы есть попытка взглянуть на проблему экзистенциально-антропологического риска, порождаемого современной техногенной цивилизацией, с точки зрения сопоставления и противостояния эстетики,...

WELTKRIEGSPHILOSOPHIE AND SCHELER'S PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Purpose. The research is aimed at understanding the philosophical and journalistic heritage of M. Scheler during 1914-1919. "The philosophy of war" is regarded as the middle link between the phenomenological and anthropo...

EUROPEAN PLASTIC ART IN ANTHROPOLOGICAL DIMENSION: FROM THE CLASSICS TO THE POSTMODERNISM

Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of corporality as an attribute of plastic art in the Ancient art, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the modernism and the postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The authors cons...

THE DESIRE FOR RECOGNITION IN THE CONTEXT OF FRANCIS FUKUYAMA’S UNIVERSAL HISTORY

Introduction. Francis Fukuyama in his famous book “The End of History and the Last Man” assumes that human history should be considered as the battle of ideologies that reaches its goal in the universalization of Western...

ФЕНОМЕН ЕМОЦІЙ НЕГАТИВНОЇ СПРЯМОВАНОСТІ В СОЦІАЛЬНОМУ БУТТІ ЛЮДИНИ

Мета. Дослідження спрямоване на визначення впливу негативних етичних емоцій на соціальне життя й діяльність особистості, що передбачає розв'язання певних задач: а) з'ясувати підходи до типологізації етичних емоцій, б)...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP383971
  • DOI 10.15802/ampr.v0i13.131937
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Z. V. Stezhko, Y. G. Stezhko (2018). CONTRADICTION OF FREEDOM AND PARADOXES OF RESPONSIBILITY (ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS). Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень, 13(), 65-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-383971