Corpus Areopagiticum in the Interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas

Abstract

In this article I intend to highlight a fundamental difference that I have seized between Dionysius interpreted by Thomas of Aquinas and the author of Corpus Areopagiticum. In the first stage, I will present the way in which Thomas understands Dionysius as a simple Aristotelian, then the confession of faith of saint Thomas regarding that particular Dionysius from The Acts of Apostles 17, 34, without, however, noticing the fact that Dionysius invokes the Holy Trinity in his texts, a dogma established only in the first Ecumenical Council of Nicaea (325). However, the most obvious issue that radically separates the two thinkers (Dionysius and Thomas) is their way of understanding theology (theologia).

Authors and Affiliations

Florin Crismareanu

Keywords

Related Articles

Excessive Hermeneutics

Shane Mackinlay, Interpreting Excess: Jean-Luc Marion, Saturated Phenomena and Hermeneutics, New York: Fordham University Press, 2010

La rationalité aux limites et les limites de la rationalité : la question de l’intégrité et de l’existence de l’espèce humaine

The purpose of this article is to address the question of our responsibility as human beings, by taking into consideration the intersection between ethics and science. I intend to prove that the issues raised by the exis...

Nietzsche et les paradoxes de la force

According to this paper, the Nietzschean notion of force actually consists of a number of paradoxes, which I seek to formulate through the philosophical problems they pose. These paradoxes revolve around this fundamental...

Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics: Concepts of reading, understanding and interpretation

Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics is a popular qualitative research interpretive method aiming to explore the meaning of individual experiences in relation to understanding human interpretation. Gadamer ide...

The three types of perception and the concept of image in Bergson

The article focuses on the constitution of the concept of image in Bergson’s second important book, Matter and Memory. It intends to show how this concept is developing throughout the three types of perception that can b...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP139878
  • DOI -
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Florin Crismareanu (2011). Corpus Areopagiticum in the Interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, 3(1), 157-174. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-139878