Counteracting Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion in Selected EU Directives on Direct Taxes

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2015, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

The paper entitled “Counteracting Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion in Select- ed EU Directives on Direct Taxes” discusses the provisions of Directive 2003/49/EC, Directive 2009/133/EC and Directive 2011/96/EC that are capable of withdrawing the benefits provided under the directives in the case of tax fraud and abuse, tax evasion or tax avoidance. The paper reviews provisions of the directives and also the case law of the European Court of Justice concerning tax fraud and abuse. The jurisprudence of the ECJ plays a key role in setting standards for regulations on the prevention of tax evasion and avoidance adopted by Member States of the European Union. The paper’s centre piece argument is that the solution adopted by the EU legislator, which shifted the burden of preventing tax escape from the EU to Member States, is ineffective and falls short of fulfilling its proper role. The paper emphasises that many tax payers take advantage of the fundamental treaty freedoms and applicable directives to obtain tax benefits or double non-taxation. Limitations imposed by a strict jurisprudential approach of the European Court of Justice also pose a significant barrier to effective tackling the negative phenomenon of aggressive tax planning based on EU laws, the paper suggests. By assessing the effects of the application of the existing regulations and juxtaposing them with the current scale of the problem, the author presents an argument for changing the direction of measures taken to curb international tax avoidance and evasion.

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Draba

Keywords

Related Articles

Propozycje opodatkowania znaczącej obecności cyfrowej w Unii Europejskiej

Autorka poszukuje odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy Unia Europejska potrzebuje własnych rozwiązań w zakresie opodatkowania gospodarki cyfrowej oraz czy rozwiązanie docelowe zaproponowane przez Komisję, czyli opodatkowanie znacz...

[i][b]The Role of the Principle of Proportionality in Determining the Limits of Property Rights[/b][/i]

The principle of justice is the aim and the means to achieve this aim is the principle of equality as well as proportionality. Even if unequal treatment is justified, then the guarantee of a different protection of prope...

Prawo i utopia w „Kodeksie natury” Étienna Gabriela Morelly

Zamiarem autora artykułu jest pokazanie związków zachodzących między literaturą a prawem. Przykładem tekstu, który można traktować jako dzieło literackie, a zarazem tekst o charakterze polityczno-prawnym jest Kodeks nat...

Causes and consequences of the division of sub-central governments tasks on its own tasks and commissioned ones

The purpose of the article is the characterization of the main reasons and consequences of the division of sub-central government tasks on its own tasks and commissioned ones and the indication of some controversy relat...

Detective’s ethic in the context of Common Minimum Standards issued by International Federation of Associations of Private Detectives

The authors – lawyers and licensed detectives – examine the topic of an ethic in detective’s profession from theoretical and practical grounds. Although the authors are well positioned to delve into theoretical aspects o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP79243
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.78
  • Views 129
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Robert Draba (2015). Counteracting Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion in Selected EU Directives on Direct Taxes. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 7(1), 135-156. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-79243