CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING JURISDICTION TO REVIEW PUBLIC LEGAL LAND DISPUTE

Abstract

In the article the legal nature of public relations associated with the use and disposal of land and presented arguments that point to the need to consider public legal land disputes over the use and disposal of land within the administrative proceedings. Found that public land dispute – is based on public law dispute between two or more parties relationships, in which at least one party is an authority (public authority, local government, their officers or employees person other entity in the exercise of their duties on the basis of legislation, including delegated powers) the subject of which stands a decision (action) of the power intended to transfer or omission (passive obstruction of transfer) ownership, use and disposal of land state or municipal ownership to private ownership or decision (action) of the authority aims to return to the state or municipal property previously transferred ownership or use of land. An criteria for determining the jurisdiction of administrative courts to review public legal land disputes, including: 1) subjects contentious relationship which is the subject of public administration, physical (legal entity), or other entity of power; 2) the subject of the dispute – the decision (action or inaction) of the authority aims to transfer ownership, use and disposal of land state or municipal property to private or municipal property, or return to the state or municipal property previously transferred ownership or land use (provided that an authority is or was a legal manager of the land and the right to transfer it to another property defined by law); 3) the reason for the dispute – a violation of the legality of government entities in the process of transfer of ownership, use and disposal of state land and communal property to private or communal ownership.

Authors and Affiliations

С. В. Бакуліна

Keywords

Related Articles

ANTI-CORRUPTION LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

This article discusses the gradual formation of anti-corruption legislation and public policy in the field of prevention of corruption. On the basis of which it is determined that the formation of this legislation was ac...

EXPERIENCE OF FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF THE ARMED CONFLICTS IN THE POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES

The armed conflict in the South East of Ukraine led to significant civilian casualties and law enforcement forces. The settlement of the armed conflict by the counterterrorist operation revealed a number of issues in the...

CRIMINALISTICAL ASPECT OF THE CONCEPT OF RELAPSE

Determination of the number of offenses committed by repeat offenders, providing such crimes criminalistical characteristics and developing methods of their investigation largely depends on understanding the meaning of a...

THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PROSECUTOR AT THE CLOSURE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH REHABILITATION GROUNDS

The article analyzes theoretical and practical problems of the prosecutor’s activity in closing criminal proceedings in connection with rehabilitating grounds (establishing the absence of a criminal offense, establishing...

THE CONVICTS’ RIGHT TO LIFE DURING SERVING OF THEIR SENTENCES

The article focuses on the analysis of the right to life. It reviews international human rights acts and national laws, provides scientific views on the right to life concept. It is noted that in the last years the penit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP475531
  • DOI -
  • Views 61
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

С. В. Бакуліна (2017). CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING JURISDICTION TO REVIEW PUBLIC LEGAL LAND DISPUTE. Юридичний науковий електронний журнал, 1(), 77-80. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-475531