Dan Zahavi and John Searle on Consciousness and Non-Reductive Materialism
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
In his 1994 paper, neuroscientist Benjamin Libet affirmed that he found a way to test the interaction between the mind and the brain. He believed that this procedure would also test the reality of a non-physical mind, emerging from neural activity. In 2000 John Searle objected to Libet’s evident dualism, affirming that the mind is not a hypothesis to test but a datum to be explained. According to Searle, Libet’s problem arose from accepting the Cartesian distinction of ‘mind’ and ‘body’, obsolete categories from an old philosophy. Searle’s solution implied the rejection both of dualism and reductive materialism, suggesting a non-reductive materialism. This first-person ontology, as Searle calls it, aims at preserving, against reductive materialism, the essential features of consciousness, i.e. subjective, qualitative and unified. Searle argued, however, that the nature of consciousness remained biological. Dan Zahavi’s thesis is that a phenomenological approach to the self and consciousness can offer a complementing alternative to the contemporary comprehension of the nature of consciousness. Engaged in an open dialogue with neuroscience and cognitive science in his dealings with consciousness, Zahavi holds, nonetheless, that this notion cannot be completely understood without reference to the notion of the self. Thus, this paper will analyse Zahavi’s ideas about the self and consciousness in Subjectivity and Selfhood (2005) as to evaluate whether his phenomenological approach is able to overcome the materialist tones of Searle’s philosophy of mind, opening the possibility of a non-reductive comprehension of human beings.
Authors and Affiliations
Agustina Lombardi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327440
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.020
- Views 85
- Downloads 0
De la Filosofía analítica al teísmo: Antony Flew
From Analytic Philosophy to Theism: Antony Flew After the great idealistic systems, the advent of nihilism and the formulation of pragmatism, philosophy restarts again creatively. To understand this rise, I will argue a...
El bien como objeto del querer. Suárez y los presupuestos apetitivos y cognoscitivos de la acción racional
The good as the object of wanting. Suárez on the appetitive and cognitive conditions of rational action This paper discusses Suárez’s characterization of the formal object of wanting, i.e. the good. Wanting, in all its...
Ragionevolezza della fede. Rapporto tra fede e ragione in Tommaso d’Aquino
Rationality of faith. Relationship between faith and reason in Thomas Aquinas The rationality of the Christian faith has been an issue debated for centuries. The relationship between faith and reason is an intrinsic rea...
En diálogo sobre cómo actúa Dios en el mundo. Recensión a un libro de Christoph Böttigheimer
Speaking about how God acts in the world. Review of Christoph Böttigheimer’s book
Mariano Artigas: introducción a su obra publicada
Mariano Artigas: Introduction to his published work The published work of Mariano Artigas (Zaragoza, 1938 – Pamplona, 2006) is extensive and addresses a very wide range of topics. The purpose of this paper is to offer a...