Homo technologicus and the Recovery of a Universal Ethic: Maximus the Confessor and Romano Guardini

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

On September 1st2017, Pope Francis and the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew issued a Joint Message for the World Day of Prayer for Creation. The gesture reveals the church’s efforts “to breathe with two lungs” on the urgent matter of climate change and ecological sustainability. But, the church leaders have also insisted on a philosophical and religious reflection on technology if humanity is to take responsibility for the environment. In particular, they have sought to correct the wrong interpretation of the biblical imperative to “have dominion over” (Gen 1:26) the creatures of the Earth and to “subdue it” (Gen 1:28) that for centuries has condoned ecological abuse, in particular in the name of technological progress. In this paper, I propose a theological reflection on Homo technologicusthrough the writings of the seventh century monk Maximus the Confessor and the twentieth century Catholic priest Romano Guardini. Maximus offers a systematic account of human techneas reflecting the mark of sin, while being God’s gift to assist us in stewarding creation. Guardini offers a challenging argument for the moral nature of technology in our times. In an age where technology extends human power, even as it seemingly takes on a life of its own, Maximus’ and Guardini’s insights on the “technological human” offer a renewed Christian anthropology that, in the tradition of natural law reasoning, can ground a global ethic for a “sustainable and integral development.” (Joint Message, 2017)

Authors and Affiliations

Nadia Delicata

Keywords

Related Articles

¿Creare est unire? Esbozo de la metafísica de la unión de Teilhard de Chardin

Creare est unire? An outline of Teilhard de Chardin's metaphysics of union As underlying leitmotiv throughout all his work, Teilhard de Chardin develops the relationship between spirit and matter. Matter (multiplicity)...

Knowledge Argument versus Bundle Theory according to Derek Parfit

According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence o...

Supervaluationism and the timeless solution to the foreknowledge problem

If God knew I were going to write this paper, was I able to refrain from writing it this morning? One possible response to this question is that God's knowledge does not take place in time and therefore He does not prope...

Problem cielesności pamięci w perspektywie eschatologicznej

Nauki kognitywne w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach znacząco wpłynęły na analizy powiązania umysłu i ciała na polu filozofii umysłu. Rozwiązania zagadnienia body-mind z kolei dotykają w sposób znaczący również teologii. W kla...

Soul or Mind? Some Remarks on Explanation in Cognitive Science

In the article author analyses the extent to which it is possible to regard the Aristotelian conception of the soul as actually necessary and applicable for modern neuroscience. The framework in which this objective is g...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP489125
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2018.020
  • Views 57
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nadia Delicata (2018). Homo technologicus and the Recovery of a Universal Ethic: Maximus the Confessor and Romano Guardini. Scientia et Fides, 6(2), 33-53. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-489125