Death Penalty in Socialist Yugoslavia and the Conflict of Normative Sources
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2010, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
The author analyses a discussion on death penalty that took place in Belgrade, at the end of the socialist era, between Igor Primorac and Ivan Jankovic. Primorac attacked the utilitarian justification of the socialist penal system, though he agreed on different, retributive grounds that death penalty for premeditated murder should be preserved. Jankovic advocated utilitarian ideas and rejected the death penalty as an atavistic aberration. In the first part of the article, their main arguments are presented and their contextual meaning is being explained. In the second part of the article, the author analyses those arguments and concludes that a) retributivism has not been the philosophy of death penalty during its history, b) that retentionist conclusions do not follow from retributive premises, c) that utilitarianism, in spite of its historical connection with abolitionism, can justify death penalty, d) that since the problem cannot be resolved on moral grounds alone, it should be resolved on political grounds, and e) that political considerations require the abolition of death penalty.
Authors and Affiliations
Ivan Vukovic
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP150111
- DOI -
- Views 133
- Downloads 0
The reinterpretation of the Hegelian philosophy of nature by Alexandre Kojève. The theory of primacy
According to Kojève, all philosophical thought develops systematically. Thus, when reading Hegel, he could not go over the text without reflecting on the delicate status of the Philosophy of nature. As opposed to ordinar...
Referential Opacity and Hermeneutics in Plato’s Dialogue Form
The paper argues that Plato’s dialogue form creates a Quinean “opaque context” that segregates the assertions by Plato’s characters in the dialogues from both Plato and the real world with the result that the dialogues r...
The movement or the flesh: two conceptions of the ontological depth by Patočka and Merleau-Ponty
Both Patočka and Merleau-Ponty conceive the world not just as an Object, but rather as a field of an irreducible phenomenal and ontological depth. Patočka’s concept of movement and Merleau-Ponty’s concept of flesh are tw...
From Private to Public: Is the Public/Private Distinction Gender Discrimination?
Martha A. Ackelsberg, Resisting Citizenship. Feminist Essays on Politics, Community and Democracy, New York and London: Routledge, 2010
Jean-Luc Marion’s Philosophy of Religion: Between Methodological Rigorousness and Hermeneutics
Tamsin Jones, A Genealogy of Marion’s Philosophy of Religion: Apparent Darkness, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2011