Decision importance as a cue for deferral
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5
Abstract
A series of 7 experiments found that people defer important decisions more than unimportant decisions, and that this is independent of choice set composition. This finding persists even when deferral does not provide more flexibility (Experiment 2), when deferral has potential disadvantages (Experiment 3), and when deferral has no material benefits and is financially costly (Experiment 4). The effect of importance on deferral was independent of potential choice conflict (Experiment 5 & 6). The only exception was a situation in which one alternative was clearly dominant; here decision importance did not affect the likelihood of deferral (Experiment 7). These results suggest that people use decision importance as a cue for deferral: more important decisions should take more time and effort.
Authors and Affiliations
Job M. T. Krijnen, Marcel Zeelenberg and Seger M. Breugelmans
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678193
- DOI -
- Views 135
- Downloads 0
Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type
This study examined framing effects in decisions concerning public health. Tversky and Kahneman’s famous Asian Disease Problem served as experimental paradigm. Subjects chose between a sure and a risky option either pres...
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Decision scientists have identified various plausible sources of ideological polarization over climate change, gun violence, national security, and like issues that turn on empirical evidence. This paper describes a stud...
Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication
In this paper I explore how the evolution of emotional expression and co-operative planning in humans may inform the way they communicate about risks, and what implication this may have for models of rationality in risk...
Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation
In two studies on mobile phone purchase decisions, we investigated consumers’ decision strategies with a newly developed process tracing tool called InterActive Process Tracing (IAPT). This tool is a combination of sever...
Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won’t accept less
We explore different contexts and mechanisms that might promote or alleviate the gender effect in risk aversion. Our main result is that we do not find gender differences in risk aversion when the choice is framed as a w...