Deliberation versus automaticity in decision making: Which presentation format features facilitate automatic decision making?

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

The idea of automatic decision making approximating normatively optimal decisions without necessitating much cognitive effort is intriguing. Whereas recent findings support the notion that such fast, automatic processes explain empirical data well, little is known about the conditions under which such processes are selected rather than more deliberate stepwise strategies. We investigate the role of the format of information presentation, focusing explicitly on the ease of information acquisition and its influence on information integration processes. In a probabilistic inference task, the standard matrix employed in prior research was contrasted with a newly created map presentation format and additional variations of both presentation formats. Across three experiments, a robust presentation format effect emerged: Automatic decision making was more prevalent in the matrix (with high information accessibility), whereas sequential decision strategies prevailed when the presentation format demanded more information acquisition effort. Further scrutiny of the effect showed that it is not driven by the presentation format as such, but rather by the extent of information search induced by a format. Thus, if information is accessible with minimal need for information search, information integration is likely to proceed in a perception-like, holistic manner. In turn, a moderate demand for information search decreases the likelihood of behavior consistent with the assumptions of automatic decision making.

Authors and Affiliations

Anke Söllner, Arndt Bröder and Benjamin E. Hilbig

Keywords

Related Articles

External validity of individual differences in multiple cue probability learning: The case of pilot training

Individuals differ in their ability to deal with unpredictable environments. Could impaired performances on learning an unpredictable cue-criteria relationship in a laboratory task be associated with impaired learning of...

Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency

Recent research suggesting that people who maximize are less happy than those who satisfice has received considerable fanfare. The current study investigates whether this conclusion reflects the construct itself or rathe...

The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used

The present research investigated the reason for mixed evidence concerning the relationship between analytic cognitive style (ACS) and political orientation in previous research. Most past research operationalized ACS wi...

How the number of options and perceived variety influence choice satisfaction: An experiment with prescription drug plans

This study measures the perceived costs, perceived benefits, choice outcome satisfaction, and choice process satisfaction from consumers making hypothetical choices amongst prescription drug plans. I juxtapose the number...

Bayesian analysis of deterministic and stochastic prisoner’s dilemma games

This paper compares the behavior of individuals playing a classic two-person deterministic prisoner’s dilemma (PD) game with choice data obtained from repeated interdependent security prisoner’s dilemma games with varyin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678059
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anke Söllner, Arndt Bröder and Benjamin E. Hilbig (2013). Deliberation versus automaticity in decision making: Which presentation format features facilitate automatic decision making?. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678059