Демодернизация или внутренние противоречия модерна?

Abstract

his article is devoted to criticism of the demodernization concept as a diagnosis of modern negative social and political phenomena. Author sees the main weakness of the demodernization concept in seeing the driving ideal of modernity as coherent and consistent. Hence the program of modernity implies an inner inconsistency that manifests, in particular, in tensions between freedom and equality, individual autonomy and common will, as well as the normative core of modernity and its institutional practices. In addition, the normative core of modernity evolves because its components do not comprise an internally consistent system but are interconnected freely and flexible. Interpretation of the program of modernity components and its constellation historically changes. One important feature of modernity is a focus on the rational reconstruction of society on the grounds of a utopian vision of an ideal society. Accordingly, ethnic cleansing and the Holocaust are the ‘dark side’ of modernity that connects with idea of the self- determination of a people that are understood as a homogeneous ethnic entity. Neoliberalism became the basic ideological program of the last decades of the twentieth century and it also reproduces important features of modernity. Neoliberalism combines the pathos of moral universalism and the aspiration of rational mastership. Implementation of the neoliberal principles of the minimal state and free market lead to a strengthening of globalized elites, increased inequality, and erosion of the middle class, which together result in a crisis of liberal democracy and the rise of populism. Therefore, the modern phenomena that can be defined as demodernization are the consequences of realizing the modern ideal of freedom defined in a neoliberal manner. They bring out the internal tensions of the program of modernity.

Authors and Affiliations

Svetlana Shcherbak

Keywords

Related Articles

КОНЕЦ «КОНЦА ИСТОРИИ»: КОНТУРЫ НОВОГО МИРА В УСЛОВИЯХ «ГИБРИДНОЙ ВОЙНЫ»

The paper tackles recent tectonic changes often assessed as the crisis of liberal democracy and, broader, as the crisis of European modernity. The author depicts how the triumphalist mood of the early 1990-s captured by...

МОБІЛІЗАЦІЯ ГРОМАДЯНСЬКОГО СУСПІЛЬСТВА У КОНФЛІКТІ НА СХОДІ УКРАЇНИ: ІДЕОЛОГІЧНІ ОБМЕЖЕННЯ ТА РЕСУРСИ РОЗБУДОВИ МИРУ

The study of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine needs to expand the heuristic boundaries and overcome one-sided approaches. In this article, an attempt is made to see the confrontation in the Donbas in the context of the de...

AGAINST THE NEW MIDDLE AGES: IMPERIAL REMODERNISM IN CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN VISUAL CULTURE

The article focuses on contemporary Russian neo-modernist utopia in visual arts, particularly on Anton Chumak’s artistic work. In his project ‘Borders’ (2015), dedicated to Donbass, Chumak offers a vision of imperial rem...

ДЕРЖАВНІ ІДЕОЛОГІЇ КОМПЛЕКТУВАННЯ ЗБРОЙНИХ СИЛ В (СХІДНО-) ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОМУ РЕГІОНІ

This article is devoted to investigation of evolution of army recruitment processes in Europe. This evolution is a periodical change of trends and ideological models in relations of state and society. The usage of popula...

ВНУТРЕННИЙ ВРАГ В ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЙ ВОЙНЕ (ДОНБАССКИЙ ИДЕОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ПАЛИМПСЕСТ)

What if the information war is not just a smoke screen behind which the true intentions of a side are concealed, but an imaginary veil that establishes reality for that side? According to Žižek, social reality is based...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP630312
  • DOI -
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Svetlana Shcherbak (2018). Демодернизация или внутренние противоречия модерна?. Идеология и политика (рус) / Ідеологія і політика (укр) / Ideology and Politics (Eng), 9(1), 17-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-630312