Determination of Ordinary Life in Japanese Cultural Traditions
Journal Title: ИДЕИ. ФИЛОСОФСКО СПИСАНИЕ - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
There is attempt to compare Eastern and Western models of thinking on examplales of Japanese and European types of rationality in this article. The author emphasized that the problem of not-being nature of time as a special form of being organisation in Japanese spiritual tradition is a result of traditional syncretism of Shinto, Zen Buddhism and Taoism worldviews. The aim of the study was comprehension of the specific of not-being nature of time, which is based on the Oriental conception of not-being.
Authors and Affiliations
Tatiana Mozgovaya
Global crisis and inner revolution. His Holiness Dalai Lama the 14TH – leader of the world revolution of consciousness
The article considers relevance of transformation of modern world outlook on the basis of assimilation of Buddhist discoveries (emptiness and selflessness of all things and persons, and interdependent existence of mankin...
Review of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference “Humanitarian dimensions of the transformation of modern higher medical education”
17 – 18 травня 2018 року у стінах Національного медичного університету імені О.О. Богомольця відбулася Всеукраїнська науково-практична конференція “Гуманітарні виміри трансформації сучасної вищої медичної освіти”. Цей за...
Networking narcissism: essence, nature, reasons for the spread, the joining of Ukrainian youth
The essence and nature of networking narcissism is studied in the article. The author states that, within the objective structure of the macro level, the networking narcissism is a general hypertrophied state of the sput...
Сharisma’s сonverted forms
In this article terminological delusions connected with attempts of essence determination of a phenomenon "charisma" are analyzed. Using the definition of the Marx’s concepts of the converted forms by Merab Mamardashvili...
Grounds and negative definition of postmodern philosophy
This article explores the reasons of negative assessments of philosophical maxims such scientists as J. Bodriyar, J.F Lyotard, J. Deleuze, F. Guattari, J. Derrida, L. Iryharey, J. Lacan, M. Sir, P. Virilio and other foun...