Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans

Journal Title: Archives of Diabetes & Obesity - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 5

Abstract

Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C levels among African Americans (AAs) than whites, we sought to examine the prevalence of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes among a community sample of adult AAs (n=704) screened for enrollment in a randomized Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). We conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate the degree of discordance between risk categories based on FPG and A1C and examine the risk factors that predicted A1C and FPG levels. To determine differential effects on risk categories defined using FPG and A1C, we examined the effects of the program on the measures at 12 weeks post-intervention among the intervention arm participants. The tests revealed different prevalence levels at baseline: A1C, 36.2% normoglycemia, 52% prediabetes and 11.8% diabetes; FPG, 81.1%, 16.8%, and 2%, respectively. There was discordance among A1C and FPG and among the risk categories (p<0.001). Both final regression models included age and waist circumference as predictors. For FPG, additional predictors were family history of diabetes and male gender. Post intervention, only those classified in the prediabetes category defined in terms of either test demonstrated intervention effects. Screening test choice results in different sample composition; both A1C and FPG respond to intervention effects among individuals classified in the prediabetes group only. These results have implications for research and clinical practice.

Authors and Affiliations

Lovoria B Williams, Jeannette O Andrews, Stephen W Looney, Andrea M Kriska, Janie Heath

Keywords

Related Articles

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Saudi Population

Background and Objective: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic factors. The prevalence of MetS are increasing worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence as well as the individual comp...

Bowels and Urine Odors and Its Solutions

From the beginning time people go for bowel outside in the fields and when he was doing bowel that time how much time he spends that place he must live in the environments of the bowel odor. And till now after many impro...

The Diabetes Epidemic in the South Pacific: A Pilot Study Utilising Hand Grip Strength in Tonga

Background: Hand-grip strength (HGS) has been shown recently to help in predicting disease outcomes and assessing health risk, particularly in cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Studies confirming its link to diabetes...

Screening for Malnutrition in Older Hospitalised Patients in an Internal Medicine Department of a Greek Public Hospital

Background: Malnutrition is a major public health concern that frequently tends to be unrecognized and untreated. About 1/3 of all patients in the hospital are undernourished globally. Malnutrition is significantly more...

Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans

Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C l...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP589324
  • DOI 10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122
  • Views 32
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lovoria B Williams, Jeannette O Andrews, Stephen W Looney, Andrea M Kriska, Janie Heath (2018). Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans. Archives of Diabetes & Obesity, 1(5), 91-95. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-589324