Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans

Journal Title: Archives of Diabetes & Obesity - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 5

Abstract

Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C levels among African Americans (AAs) than whites, we sought to examine the prevalence of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes among a community sample of adult AAs (n=704) screened for enrollment in a randomized Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). We conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate the degree of discordance between risk categories based on FPG and A1C and examine the risk factors that predicted A1C and FPG levels. To determine differential effects on risk categories defined using FPG and A1C, we examined the effects of the program on the measures at 12 weeks post-intervention among the intervention arm participants. The tests revealed different prevalence levels at baseline: A1C, 36.2% normoglycemia, 52% prediabetes and 11.8% diabetes; FPG, 81.1%, 16.8%, and 2%, respectively. There was discordance among A1C and FPG and among the risk categories (p<0.001). Both final regression models included age and waist circumference as predictors. For FPG, additional predictors were family history of diabetes and male gender. Post intervention, only those classified in the prediabetes category defined in terms of either test demonstrated intervention effects. Screening test choice results in different sample composition; both A1C and FPG respond to intervention effects among individuals classified in the prediabetes group only. These results have implications for research and clinical practice.

Authors and Affiliations

Lovoria B Williams, Jeannette O Andrews, Stephen W Looney, Andrea M Kriska, Janie Heath

Keywords

Related Articles

Epidemiology of Osteoporosis in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Background and Objective: The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing. Osteoporosis has become an alarming health problem throughout the entire world. The aim of this study were to estimate the epidemiology of osteopo...

A Phase II Study to Evaluate Connections in Higher Risk For Heart Disease and Narcissists Appearance in Private Pharmacy Institutions Pune University India Behaviors Among Men Who Have Work With Men (MM): Is There Evidence of an Effect?

Respect can earn. Wrinkle shows life is loved your life and ageing with dignity. Self-admiration increasing day by day. According to a study conducted by the Private Pharmacy Instituions in Pune University, men women hav...

Bowels and Urine Odors and Its Solutions

From the beginning time people go for bowel outside in the fields and when he was doing bowel that time how much time he spends that place he must live in the environments of the bowel odor. And till now after many impro...

Prevalence of Obesity and Association with Adherence to Mediterranean Diet in Medical, Nursing and Administrative Staff of a Greek Public Hospital

Obesity is currently considered to be the most common metabolic disease. During the last decades, its incidence has dramatically risen both in developed and developing countries. Several studies of the health of healthca...

Management of Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

The rate limiting step of intensive diabetes management for patients with diabetes is treatment induced hypoglycemia. Thus, hypoglycemia remains a significant barrier in optimizing glycemic control and reducing long-term...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP589324
  • DOI 10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122
  • Views 51
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lovoria B Williams, Jeannette O Andrews, Stephen W Looney, Andrea M Kriska, Janie Heath (2018). Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans. Archives of Diabetes & Obesity, 1(5), 91-95. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-589324