Differences in static and dynamic bike fit with 3d motion capture

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Bicycle fitting is the adjustment of bicycle configuration to suit rider requirements through appropriate placement of contact points; pedals, saddle and handlebars (Burke 1994: Clin Sports Med, 13(1), 1-14). Traditional fitting uses static assessment of parameters such as knee angle through the bottom of the pedal stroke and saddle setback measured by knee over pedal horizontal separation (KOPS) (Holmes et al., 1994: Clinics in Sports Medicine 13(1), 187). Dynamic fitting is now increasingly popular through video analysis or 3d motion capture. However no comparison has been made of differences between static and dynamic measurement or assessment reported of the reliability of motion capture for bicycle fitting. Purpose: To investigate the repeatability of key bike fitting kinematic parameters and differences between static and dynamic conditions. Methods: 15 subjects performed repeated motion capture trials over three sessions in both static and dynamic conditions. Markers were applied to anatomical landmarks and kinematics collected using a Vicon 3d motion capture system. Results: Typical intra-session errors for angular parameters ranged from 1.7° (4.2°) for dynamic (static) knee flexion to 4.2° (4.9°) for ankle plantarflexion. Typical error for KOPS was 6.6 mm (12 mm). Significant (p<0.001) differences between static and dynamic conditions were observed for all parameters. Knee flexion was 5.4° greater in dynamic conditions (95% CI 3.5°, 7.4°). Corresponding dynamic ankle plantarflexion was 7.8° greater (5.9°, 9.6°) and hip flexion 5.1° greater (3.8°, 6.5°). KOPS was 7.7 mm further forward in dynamic conditions (3.3, 12.1) and dynamic ankle plantarflexion at KOPS was 3.6° greater (1.8°, 5.4°). Discussion: Typical errors showed moderate repeatability indicating the system was fit for purpose but these errors require consideration in the fitting process. Differences between static and dynamic parameters appear to originate at the ankle, with a tendency for riders to drop their heels when stationary. Conclusion: Common guidance to fit to a knee angle between 25-35° should be adjusted to 30-40° for dynamic measurement.

Authors and Affiliations

M Corbett| Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Worcester, United Kingdom, J Bevins| Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Worcester, United Kingdom

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of power output demands for a top-10 ranking between Tour de France and Vuelta a España

Background: Grand Tours (GT) are extreme endurance cycling events with about 3500 km covered in twenty-one stages during three weeks. Using the heart rate measurement, Lucia et al. (Lucia et al., 2003: Medicine & Science...

Numerical simulations of cross wind effects on cyclist aerodynamic resistance

Introduction: In outdoor cycling, cross wind can affect the race strategy and the final results. Ad-hoc strategies, like echelons and Belgian tourniquet formations, are indeed adopted by cyclists to reduce wind effects a...

Pedal force effectiveness in Cycling: a review of constraints and training effects

Pedal force effectiveness in cycling is usually measured by the ratio of force perpendicular to the crank (effective force) and total force applied to the pedal (resultant force). Most studies measuring pedal forces have...

Effect of deceptively aggressive bike pacing on sprint-distance triathlon performance

Introduction: Whilst aggressive bike pacing has been found to impair subsequent run performance during triathlon, this strategy appears to enhance total cycle-run time over the sprint-distance format (Suriano & Bishop, 2...

The effect of exercise mode on salivary IgA secretion in high level triathletes

Background: It is widely accepted that exercise of either long duration or high intensity can have suppressive effects on the immune system. However, it remains to be identified if exercise mode plays a part in the deter...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2841
  • DOI -
  • Views 402
  • Downloads 26

How To Cite

M Corbett, J Bevins (2014). Differences in static and dynamic bike fit with 3d motion capture. Journal of Science and Cycling, 3(2), 0-0. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2841