Differences in static and dynamic bike fit with 3d motion capture

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Bicycle fitting is the adjustment of bicycle configuration to suit rider requirements through appropriate placement of contact points; pedals, saddle and handlebars (Burke 1994: Clin Sports Med, 13(1), 1-14). Traditional fitting uses static assessment of parameters such as knee angle through the bottom of the pedal stroke and saddle setback measured by knee over pedal horizontal separation (KOPS) (Holmes et al., 1994: Clinics in Sports Medicine 13(1), 187). Dynamic fitting is now increasingly popular through video analysis or 3d motion capture. However no comparison has been made of differences between static and dynamic measurement or assessment reported of the reliability of motion capture for bicycle fitting. Purpose: To investigate the repeatability of key bike fitting kinematic parameters and differences between static and dynamic conditions. Methods: 15 subjects performed repeated motion capture trials over three sessions in both static and dynamic conditions. Markers were applied to anatomical landmarks and kinematics collected using a Vicon 3d motion capture system. Results: Typical intra-session errors for angular parameters ranged from 1.7° (4.2°) for dynamic (static) knee flexion to 4.2° (4.9°) for ankle plantarflexion. Typical error for KOPS was 6.6 mm (12 mm). Significant (p<0.001) differences between static and dynamic conditions were observed for all parameters. Knee flexion was 5.4° greater in dynamic conditions (95% CI 3.5°, 7.4°). Corresponding dynamic ankle plantarflexion was 7.8° greater (5.9°, 9.6°) and hip flexion 5.1° greater (3.8°, 6.5°). KOPS was 7.7 mm further forward in dynamic conditions (3.3, 12.1) and dynamic ankle plantarflexion at KOPS was 3.6° greater (1.8°, 5.4°). Discussion: Typical errors showed moderate repeatability indicating the system was fit for purpose but these errors require consideration in the fitting process. Differences between static and dynamic parameters appear to originate at the ankle, with a tendency for riders to drop their heels when stationary. Conclusion: Common guidance to fit to a knee angle between 25-35° should be adjusted to 30-40° for dynamic measurement.

Authors and Affiliations

M Corbett| Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Worcester, United Kingdom, J Bevins| Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Worcester, United Kingdom

Keywords

Related Articles

Reliability of power meter calibration by mathematical modelling of treadmill cycling

Background & Purpose. In cycling, several physiological values are taken into account to evaluate the performance level of each athlete and/or to plan his training program. One of these values is the maximal power output...

Attitudes towards doping in Spanish competitive female Cyclists vs. Triathletes

The aim of the present study was to know and compare the attitudes towards doping in Spanish competitive female cyclists and triathletes. All the female cyclists and triathletes who competed (U23 and elite) under license...

Within-individual haemoglobin variation and the athlete biological passport: a longitudinal investigation of 13,887 haemoglobin concentration readings in elite athletes

The Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), introduced by the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) in 2008, has proven a critical tool for the reduction of doping cases. The ABP estimates individual reference ranges for haem...

Incorporating internal mechanical power into performance models in cycling

Background: A number of models have been developed to establish the energy cost of cycling. These models have become better refined to account for the various energy demands, including air and rolling resistances. Among...

Conservative Management for a Traumatic Cervical Spine Cycling Injury

Competitive cycling holds an inherent risk of traumatic injury often resulting in fracture. Questions regarding the probability of return to sport then arise. The purpose of this case report is to describe the treatment...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2841
  • DOI -
  • Views 411
  • Downloads 26

How To Cite

M Corbett, J Bevins (2014). Differences in static and dynamic bike fit with 3d motion capture. Journal of Science and Cycling, 3(2), 0-0. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2841