Difficult Intubation: Prospective observational study to evaluate it’s key predictors

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: Airway assessment to identify the predictors of difficult intubation (DI) during general anaesthesia is very important to maintain patient safety and prevent untoward events like hypoxia and brain damage. The aim of our study is to evaluate the occurrence of difficult tracheal intubation during general anaesthesia in elective surgeries and to find out the key predictors of difficult intubation. Materials and Method: A prospective study was conducted in 450 patients posted for elective general surgeries requiring general anaesthesia over a one year period. The screening tests for difficult intubation included the following: Mallampati classification (MPC), inter-incisor gap (IG), thyromental distance (TMD), subluxation of mandible (slux) and restricted neck movements (RNM). Risk factors assessed included obesity, neck circumference, short neck, buck teeth and poor dentition (loose / missing). Difficult intubation was defined when any one or more of these criteria were present: > 2 attempts at intubation; > 5-minutes duration of laryngoscopy; Cormack Lehane grade 3 or 4; use of intubating aids like McCoy laryngoscope and Frova (tracheal introducer). Multivariate analysis using a binary logistic regression was performed for the ten predictors. Predictive accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values. Result: Incidence of DI was 20.8%. It had strong correlation with MPC, RNM, TMD and poor dentition with an odds ratio of 9.2, 5.2, 4.8, and 2.58 respectively. TMD is most sensitive predictor (55.32%) and RNM is most specific predictor (97.2%). MPC, RNM, TMD are the key independent predictors of difficult intubation.

Authors and Affiliations

Urvi H. Desai, Devendra W. Thakare, Amala G. Kudalkar

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study between inj. ropivacaine 0.75% and inj.ropivacaine 0.75% with inj. dexmedetomidine in lumbar epidural anesthesia for vaginal hysterectomies

Introduction: Regional anesthesia has lots of advantages compared to general anesthesia for Vaginal hysterectomy. Intrathecal anesthesia and Epidural anaesthesia are regional anaesthesia techniques used for Vaginal Hyste...

A randomized controlled double blind study comparing the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia

Introduction and Aim Ropivacaine and bupivacaine have been found to provide adequate labor analgesia when given epidurally The aim of this randomized double blind study was to compare the onset of sensory block in epidur...

Comparison of epsilon aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid to control postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery- A randomised double blind trial

In cardiac surgery, postoperative bleeding is associated with an increased incidence of surgical reexploration, increased use of blood and blood products, significant morbidity such as renal failure, sepsis, arrhythmias,...

A comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of timing principle and priming principle for tracheal intubation using rocuronium

The present study is to compare the "Timing principle" and the "Priming principle" for tracheal intubation using rocuronium during balanced anesthesia by assessing the Intubating conditions and Hemodynamic changes during...

Saddle block spinal anesthesia and its effect on hemodynamic status and analgesia

Introduction The sitting position is often used for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia especially when lower lumbar and sacral levels of sensory anesthesia are required An advantage of this position is that the compli...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP315350
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0081
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Urvi H. Desai, Devendra W. Thakare, Amala G. Kudalkar (2017). Difficult Intubation: Prospective observational study to evaluate it’s key predictors. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(3), 406-411. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-315350