Difficult Intubation: Prospective observational study to evaluate it’s key predictors

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: Airway assessment to identify the predictors of difficult intubation (DI) during general anaesthesia is very important to maintain patient safety and prevent untoward events like hypoxia and brain damage. The aim of our study is to evaluate the occurrence of difficult tracheal intubation during general anaesthesia in elective surgeries and to find out the key predictors of difficult intubation. Materials and Method: A prospective study was conducted in 450 patients posted for elective general surgeries requiring general anaesthesia over a one year period. The screening tests for difficult intubation included the following: Mallampati classification (MPC), inter-incisor gap (IG), thyromental distance (TMD), subluxation of mandible (slux) and restricted neck movements (RNM). Risk factors assessed included obesity, neck circumference, short neck, buck teeth and poor dentition (loose / missing). Difficult intubation was defined when any one or more of these criteria were present: > 2 attempts at intubation; > 5-minutes duration of laryngoscopy; Cormack Lehane grade 3 or 4; use of intubating aids like McCoy laryngoscope and Frova (tracheal introducer). Multivariate analysis using a binary logistic regression was performed for the ten predictors. Predictive accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values. Result: Incidence of DI was 20.8%. It had strong correlation with MPC, RNM, TMD and poor dentition with an odds ratio of 9.2, 5.2, 4.8, and 2.58 respectively. TMD is most sensitive predictor (55.32%) and RNM is most specific predictor (97.2%). MPC, RNM, TMD are the key independent predictors of difficult intubation.

Authors and Affiliations

Urvi H. Desai, Devendra W. Thakare, Amala G. Kudalkar

Keywords

Related Articles

A prospective, observational audit of failed regional anaesthesia in 4085 caesarean sections at a tertiary care hospital

Introduction: A prospective observational study was conducted in 4085 caesarean sections performed under Regional anaesthesia (RA) from February 2014 to January 2017 in tertiary care centre. The incidence and various con...

Comparative study of dexamethasone nebulisation with magnesium sulphate nebulisation in preventing post operative sore throat following endotracheal intubation

Introduction Postoperative sore throat is one of the most common complications following endotracheal intubation Though considered minor complication it may cause significant patient dissatisfaction Various nonpharmacolo...

Comparison of the effect of oral esomeprazole with pantoprazole on gastric pH and gastric volume: “A randomised double blind placebo controlled study”

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of prophylactic use of oral esomeprazole, pantoprazole and Placebo on Gastric pH and Gastric volume at the time of induction (post-induction) and at recovery (pre-extubation),...

Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on stress induced blood glucose levels and intraoperative sevoflurane requirement

Introduction Dexmedetomidine has been shown to blunt the stress response to surgery and reduce the consumption of inhalational anaesthetic agents Hence we designed this study to observe the effects of IV Dexmedetomidine...

A randomized controlled double blind study comparing the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor analgesia

Introduction and Aim Ropivacaine and bupivacaine have been found to provide adequate labor analgesia when given epidurally The aim of this randomized double blind study was to compare the onset of sensory block in epidur...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP315350
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0081
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Urvi H. Desai, Devendra W. Thakare, Amala G. Kudalkar (2017). Difficult Intubation: Prospective observational study to evaluate it’s key predictors. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(3), 406-411. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-315350