Comparative study of two doses of bupivacaine along with fentanyl citrate in spinal anaesthesia for short surface surgeries below umbilicus

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal opioids are synergistic with local anaesthetics and intensify the sensory block without increasing the motor block and offer haemodynamic stability. This study was planned to compare the effects of low doses and high dose bupivacaine along with fentanyl citrate. Methods: This study was carried out in patients presenting for short surface surgical procedures below umbilicus from physical state ASA grade I and II. 60 Patients were randomly allocated in to Group BF 5 [Inj. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 5 mg + Inj. Fentanyl citrate 25 μg] and Group BF 7.5 [Inj. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 7.5 mg + Inj. Fentanyl citrate 25 μg] of 30 each. Sensory and motor block were assessed. Patients were observed for both intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: Mean levels of sensory blockade to pinprick were T10 in group BF5 and T8 in group BF7.5. Total duration of sensory blockade (175.3+14.56 min) and motor blockade (129.5+19.09 min) were significantly higher in group BF7.5. Hypotension was seen in 7 patients of BF7.5 as compared to just 2 patients in group BF5. None of the patients from either group had bradycardia and respiratory depression. Incidences of shivering, pruritus and headache were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Both doses of bupivacaine hydrochloride 5 mg and 7.5 mg with fentanyl citrate 25 μg intrathecally provide successful anaesthesia below T10 spinal segment. However, 7.5 mg dose is associated with denser block, increased incidence of hypotension, delay in achieving highest sensory blockade and delayed recovery which delayed ambulation and discharge time following short surgical procedures.

Authors and Affiliations

Kalpeshkumar Mistry, Ankur Gandhi

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of catheterization of internal jugular vein by ultrasound guided versus landmark approach IN I.C.U. patients

Introduction Central venous line placement is one of the essential procedures in the treatment of critically ill patients admitted in the intensive care unit Central venous catheterization is required not only for provid...

A comparative study between dexmedetomidine, clonidine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation – a randomised study

Introduction: The stress responses to laryngoscopy comprising of elevation in heart rate and rise in systolic and diastolic pressure are well known. The potential for life threatening complications associated with these...

Comparative study of psoas compartment block and sciatic nerve block with that of spinal block anesthesia for lower extremity surgeries

Aim and Objectives: Aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the block, hemodynamic effects, postoperative analgesia and side effects of combined psoas compartment sciatic nerve block with continuous spina...

Correlation of ultrasound guided measurement of inferior vena cava diameter to central venous pressure to assess the volume status of intensive care unit patients

Background: Assessment of intravascular volume status is an essential parameter for the diagnosis and management of critically-ill patients. In order to assess the intravascular volume status noninvasively, we conducted...

Anaesthetic management of primigravida with ovarian cyst for emergency laprotomy- A case report

To avoid fetal exposure to polypharmacy and protection of maternal airway, regional anesthesia is usually preferred in pregnancy. Here, we report a case of 20 year old primigravida with 13±2weeks of gestation, diagnosed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP311318
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0012
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kalpeshkumar Mistry, Ankur Gandhi (2017). Comparative study of two doses of bupivacaine along with fentanyl citrate in spinal anaesthesia for short surface surgeries below umbilicus. Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, 4(1), 51-55. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-311318