Dissenting opinion of sir Arnold McNair
Journal Title: Lex portus - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
Sir Arnold McNair consider that the delimitation of territorial waters made by the Norwegian Decree of 1935 is in conflict with international law, and that its effect will be to injure the principle of the freedom of the seas and to encourage further encroachments upon the high seas by coastal States. I regret therefore that I am unable to concur in the Judgment of the Court.
Authors and Affiliations
Arnold McNair
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP175864
- DOI -
- Views 98
- Downloads 0
Transformation of the Maritime doctrine of Ukraine: conceptual bases
Ukraine is a traditional maritime nation, which has a strong port, shipbuilding, human potential involved in the maritime industry. Ukraine seeks to form its own maritime policy and to define the prospects for its develo...
Применение юридической герменевтики для преодоления конфликта квалификации унифицированных норм о морском залоге и ипотеке
В статье автор концентрирует внимание на проблемах конфликта квалификации норм Международной конвенции о морских залогах и ипотеках 1993 г. Отмечается, что совершенствование законодательства о морских залогах и ипотеке м...
Правове забезпечення контейнерних перевезень: сучасний стан та розвиток в Україні
У статті досліджено історичний розвиток та сучасний стан правового забезпечення контейнерних перевезень вантажів. Проаналізовано нормативні документи ООН та ІМО про контейнерні перевезення, розглянуто правове регулювання...
Features of a Transposition of «an acquis» of the EU in the Legal System of Ukraine in the Process of Implementation of Ukraine and the EU Association Agreement and the Energy Community Treaty
An article is devoted to the analysis of process of transposition «an acquis» of the EU in the legal system of Ukraine, provided by the Agreement on association and the Energy Community Treaty. The author notes that the...
The equidistance principle not a rule of customary international law
The material is devoted to the practice of International Court in continental shelf cases. The Court consequently concluded that the Geneva Convention was not in its origins or inception declaratory of a mandatory rule o...