DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, Specification, and Explanation
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2006, Vol 3, Issue 0
Abstract
This essay will evaluate competing explanations for the origin of the information necessary to build the first living cell. To do so will require determining what biologists have meant by the term information as it has been applied to biomacromolecules. As many have noted, „information” can denote several theoretically distinct concepts. This essay will attempt to eliminate this ambiguity and to determine precisely what type of information origin-of-life researchers must explain „the origin of.” What follows will first seek to characterize the information in DNA, RNA, and proteins as an explanandum (a fact in need of explanation) and, second, to evaluate the efficacy of competing classes of explanation for the origin of biological information (that is, the competing explanans). Part I will seek to show that molecular biologists have used the term information consistently to refer to the joint properties of complexity and functional specificity or specification. Part II will evaluate competing types of explanation for the origin of the specified biological information necessary to produce the first living system. Part II will critique the causal adequacy of chemical evolutionary theories based on „chance,” „necessity,” and the combination of the two. A concluding part III will suggest that the phenomenon of information understood as specified complexity requires a radically different explanatory approach. In particular, I will argue that our present knowledge of causal powers suggests intelligent design as a better, more causally adequate explanation for the origin of the specified complexity (the information so defined) present in large biomolecules such as DNA RNA, and proteins.
Authors and Affiliations
Stephen Meyer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP161523
- DOI -
- Views 163
- Downloads 0
Methodological Naturalism in Evolution-Creation Controversy in the Light of Paul K. Feyerabend’s Views
The evolution-creation controversy has last for a long time. At its core is the fact that evolutionists and creationists have different understandings of science. For the former science is a naturalistic enterprise. Expl...
Miracles and Molecules
It is a review of Michael J. Behe’s book titled [i]Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution[/i] (The Free Press, New York 1996), containing the criticism of evolutionary theory. Author criticizes Behe’s...
Jak w zaprojektowanym Wszechświecie zdefiniować to, co niezaprojektowane
Argument z projektu, przeformułowany obecnie przez sympatyków ruchu Inteligentnego Projektu, jest oparty przede wszystkim na przeciwstawieniu rzeczy zaprojektowanych rzeczom niezaprojektowanym. Fakt ten jest jednak kłopo...
Kreacjonizm młodej Ziemi a koncepcja Big Bangu. Poglądy Johna Hartnetta z konstruktywistycznej i eksternalistycznej perspektywy
Dr John G. Hartnett, fizyk posiadający publikacje w czasopismach naukowych głównego nurtu, jest kreacjonistą młodej Ziemi i mocno sprzeciwia się teorii Big Bangu. Uważa on, że rozszerzania się przestrzeni, o czym mówi ta...
Postscript (2015)