Dzieło, którego nie ma? Praktyczne (i ontologiczne) powody niedostępności Xięgi Bałwochwalczej
Journal Title: Schulz/Forum - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
In the age of technological reproductibility the original of The Booke of Idolatry has disappeared under more and more replicas. We have been talking and writing about reproductions which are more and more distant from the original: reflections, reflexes, copies, representations, and effigies. Until today, the whole cycle of Schulz’s cliché-verres has not been published in an adequate form – there are only more successful reproductions of particular graphics. At any rate, the identity of The Booke has always been precarious and ambiguous. It has always been a work in motion – flickering, unstable, composed in various ways since particular graphics have appeared in different authorial configurations (files) each of which lead its own, independent life. Thus The Booke of Idolatry has its multiple history and no “hard” ontology. As a whole, it is not available. Still, the trouble with it begins already at the elementary level of an individual graphic. The differences among available copies have been caused by technological conditions (different chemical processing of the positives), which bring about specific material (different pace of ageing) as well as artistic consequences (replicating his cliché-verres, Schulz would choose either a sepia or a silver-black tone). As a result, different prints of the same graphic look different, which implies contingency of seeing and, what follows, also of understanding and interpretation. We may encounter The Booke of Idolatry only in its specific historical version, by coming across its individual copy. A comparison of a dozen or so preiconographic descriptions (or perhaps testimonies of looking/seeing) of the same copy of Mademoiselle Circe and Her Troupe reveals a fundamental diversity of views. Is it possible to have a debate on meaning without a consensus as regards what we can see? Is a pact concerning a visible object of the debate made (or perhaps not made?) in passing, while we interpret it in a joint effort to find its meaning?
Authors and Affiliations
Stanisław Rosiek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP169850
- DOI -
- Views 49
- Downloads 0
Szklane klisze albo dwie strony (z) Księgi. Ficowskiego wiersze o Schulzu
The paper is a comparative study of two poems by Jerzy Ficowski in memory of Bruno Schulz. Cliché-verre [glass printing plate cast] is a special technique used by the author of "The Cinnamon Shops" in his "Booke of Idola...
Schulzowskie dubia
The article is a series of short notes about intertextual mysteries in Bruno Schulz’s literary works. What is the origin of the enigmatic title Street of Crocodiles? Who exactly is the sceptic from Schulz’s essay on Aldo...
Eduard Fuchs i Bruno Schulz
In 1913, the Albert Langen publishing house in Munich published two-volume work, Die Weiberherrschaft in der Geschichte der Menschheit (The Rule of Women in the History of Mankind). Compiling 665 reproductions of drawing...
Korekta
The fourth issue of “Schulz/Forum” is an opportunity to draw conclusions, but also to correct the originally chosen approach. Its dominant are Jewish motifs in Schulz’s life and fiction. Besides, it contains a new rubric...
Schulz w katalogu Towarzystwa Wydawniczego „Rój”
Bruno Schulz placed both of his collections of short stories with “Rój” Publishers. Its 1938 catalogue, designed by Mieczysław Berman (some of the “Schulz” pages are reproduced in the present issue), sums up the publishi...