Dzieło, którego nie ma? Praktyczne (i ontologiczne) powody niedostępności Xięgi Bałwochwalczej
Journal Title: Schulz/Forum - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
In the age of technological reproductibility the original of The Booke of Idolatry has disappeared under more and more replicas. We have been talking and writing about reproductions which are more and more distant from the original: reflections, reflexes, copies, representations, and effigies. Until today, the whole cycle of Schulz’s cliché-verres has not been published in an adequate form – there are only more successful reproductions of particular graphics. At any rate, the identity of The Booke has always been precarious and ambiguous. It has always been a work in motion – flickering, unstable, composed in various ways since particular graphics have appeared in different authorial configurations (files) each of which lead its own, independent life. Thus The Booke of Idolatry has its multiple history and no “hard” ontology. As a whole, it is not available. Still, the trouble with it begins already at the elementary level of an individual graphic. The differences among available copies have been caused by technological conditions (different chemical processing of the positives), which bring about specific material (different pace of ageing) as well as artistic consequences (replicating his cliché-verres, Schulz would choose either a sepia or a silver-black tone). As a result, different prints of the same graphic look different, which implies contingency of seeing and, what follows, also of understanding and interpretation. We may encounter The Booke of Idolatry only in its specific historical version, by coming across its individual copy. A comparison of a dozen or so preiconographic descriptions (or perhaps testimonies of looking/seeing) of the same copy of Mademoiselle Circe and Her Troupe reveals a fundamental diversity of views. Is it possible to have a debate on meaning without a consensus as regards what we can see? Is a pact concerning a visible object of the debate made (or perhaps not made?) in passing, while we interpret it in a joint effort to find its meaning?
Authors and Affiliations
Stanisław Rosiek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP169850
- DOI -
- Views 38
- Downloads 0
Antyportret w wersji literackiej
In The Cinnamon Shops reader can find both echoes of the classic images of faces, referring to the tradition of physiognomy and tradition of portrait painting, as well as images of faces belonging to the species of antip...
Miasta, manekiny i maszyny metafizyczne
The French critic reveals a whole extensive network of affinities which connect Schulz’s oneiric fiction with that of Alfred Kubin, E.T.A. Hoffmann, Max Blecher, and – perhaps not surprisingly – Franz Kafka. Selecting fr...
Powrót wielkich ptaków
The essay is a textological fantasy based on a suggestion, which is implied in Schulz’s fiction, that its protagonist, the Father, is not so much a merchant from the olden days as a self-appointed magician. Still, the Fa...
O „Portrecie psubrata” i dyskursywizowaniu Schulza
Edward Mielniczek’s novel, as unattractive in many respects as it is, surprises the reader with Bruno Schulz as its protagonist. The author presents the last weeks of Schulz’s life, stressing no so much his tragic lot, b...
Przypadek hermeneutyki fenomenologicznej Brunona Schulza
The fundamental premise of Bruno Schulz’s theory of interpretation is an assumption that reality has some meaning. This meaning is an intentional object which must be discovered in a process of creative interpretation. I...