Dzieło, którego nie ma? Praktyczne (i ontologiczne) powody niedostępności Xięgi Bałwochwalczej
Journal Title: Schulz/Forum - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
In the age of technological reproductibility the original of The Booke of Idolatry has disappeared under more and more replicas. We have been talking and writing about reproductions which are more and more distant from the original: reflections, reflexes, copies, representations, and effigies. Until today, the whole cycle of Schulz’s cliché-verres has not been published in an adequate form – there are only more successful reproductions of particular graphics. At any rate, the identity of The Booke has always been precarious and ambiguous. It has always been a work in motion – flickering, unstable, composed in various ways since particular graphics have appeared in different authorial configurations (files) each of which lead its own, independent life. Thus The Booke of Idolatry has its multiple history and no “hard” ontology. As a whole, it is not available. Still, the trouble with it begins already at the elementary level of an individual graphic. The differences among available copies have been caused by technological conditions (different chemical processing of the positives), which bring about specific material (different pace of ageing) as well as artistic consequences (replicating his cliché-verres, Schulz would choose either a sepia or a silver-black tone). As a result, different prints of the same graphic look different, which implies contingency of seeing and, what follows, also of understanding and interpretation. We may encounter The Booke of Idolatry only in its specific historical version, by coming across its individual copy. A comparison of a dozen or so preiconographic descriptions (or perhaps testimonies of looking/seeing) of the same copy of Mademoiselle Circe and Her Troupe reveals a fundamental diversity of views. Is it possible to have a debate on meaning without a consensus as regards what we can see? Is a pact concerning a visible object of the debate made (or perhaps not made?) in passing, while we interpret it in a joint effort to find its meaning?
Authors and Affiliations
Stanisław Rosiek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP169850
- DOI -
- Views 66
- Downloads 0
Po co tłumaczyć na nowo Brunona Schulza?
Criticizing the available translations of Bruno Schulz’s works into French, the author explains why still another translation was necessary. Several years after writing a play about Schulz’s life and work (Bruno or, A Gr...
Schulzoidzi
The term “schulzoids,” coined by Igor Klech to identify the admirers of Schulz’s fiction and graphic art, who travel to Drogobych in search of the genuine cinnamon shops, has been accepted by the Schulz scholars as refer...
„Niepokój, groza wieczności”. Taine czytany przez Schulza (próba lektury równoległej)
There is only one published piece of evidence that Bruno Schulz read Taine: a note that he made in reference to Taine’s Philosophy of Art (pages 51-71 of volume II of the Polish 1911 Lviv edition). The note has been disc...
Nieobecna obecność
The essay is an attempt to describe and interpret three recently discovered photographs taken on October 2, 1938 during the so-called “anti-aircraft and anti-gas defense week” organized by the paramilitary League for Ant...
Schulz i Lille
Bruno Schulz visited Paris in August 1938. He wanted to organize there an exhibition of his works of art and for that reason he met, among others, Ludwik Lille, a graphic artist and a painter, member of an avant-garde gr...