Effect of Different Lighting Conditions on Proximal Caries Detection in Dental School Settings

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 7

Abstract

Introduction: Environmental factors, including ambient light, play an important role in caries detection. Dental private practices and dental school clinics are exposed to extraneous light from fluorescent fixtures, operative unit lights and/or windows. In previous studies, visual fatigue and impaired diagnostic accuracy are found to be associated with the viewing conditions. Aim: The study aims to evaluate and compare dental students’ performance at detecting proximal caries on intraoral digital radiographs, under different ambient light conditions. Materials and Methods: Eight randomly chosen senior dental students and a dentist evaluated intraoral digital images of 32 extracted teeth mounted in 12 quadrants. Almost half of the teeth were carious as confirmed by histology. The illuminance measuring unit (Lux) was used to measure the light conditions at luminous flux per unit area. Raters viewed the images in ambient light conditions i.e., dim light settings (Less than 50 Lux) and in bright light settings (more than 800 Lux). Images were viewed with the same calibrated monitor. All other viewing conditions were controlled. Raters stated their certainty of caries presence on a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for all observations and for both light settings. Results: Raters performed at a higher specificity under dim light conditions (p<0.05). ROC analysis showed that the overall performance under dim light environment was better than the bright light environment (0.745 vs. 0.710), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The results support reducing ambient light levels to rule out caries, as there is a significantly higher specificity and performance in a dim light environment compared to bright one.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohammed Alsaati, Thomas Deahl, Marcel Noujeim

Keywords

Related Articles

Reciprocal Relations between Work and Health: A Theoretical Understanding from the History of Occupational Health and Behaviour

ABSTRACT A healthy workplace is always required for promotion of good health and wellbeing of workers. Health depends on reinforcement of various external factors of productivity. Performance of a worker is influenced by...

Serum Urokinase Plasminogen Activator as a Novel Biological Marker for COPD- A Review

ABSTRACT Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a progressive disease of the airways is associated with chronic inflammation of respiratory passages that leads to irreversible lung dysfunction and distinct morphol...

Up the Duff With Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: The Traumas and the Dilemmas

Lymphoma is fourth most frequent malignancy diagnosed prenatally (~1:6000 cases), with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) forming the major chunk. However, in recent times, there has been an increase in occurrence of Non-Hodgkin’s...

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Associated with Lung Embolism: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease, where the immune system antibodies damage and attack the body’s own cells and tissues. Antibodies are proteins that protect the body against infections....

Duodenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Chronic Diarrhoea in Immunosuppressed Patients from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India

ABSTRACT Introduction: Chronic diarrhoea in immunocompromised patients is due to a variety of causes including opportunistic pathogens that flourish in such a milieu. While stool examination may diagnose some pathogens,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP526032
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34353.11734
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohammed Alsaati, Thomas Deahl, Marcel Noujeim (2018). Effect of Different Lighting Conditions on Proximal Caries Detection in Dental School Settings. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(7), 6-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-526032