EFFECT OF EXTENDING THE RESPONSE WINDOW AND OF SUBJECT PRACTICE ON MEASURES OF AUDITORY PROCESSING IN CHILDREN WITH LEARNING OR READING DISABILITY

Journal Title: Journal of Hearing Science - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: This study studied the effect of extending the response window on the auditory processing (AP) test performance of children with a learning disability or reading disability (LD/RD). The study also investigated whether subject practice affected test performance. Material and methods: Twenty-four children with an LD and 12 typically developing (TD) age-matched peers between 9 and 13 years of age participated in the study. The participants were administered three AP tests – the dichotic digit (DD), duration pattern sequence (DPS), and random gap detection (RGD) test – under two conditions: standard response window and extended response window. Results: The performance of the LD group on the DD and DPS tests significantly improved using an extended time window whereas the per¬formance of the TD group did not change. Conclusions: The findings suggest that some children with an LD achieve higher scores on auditory processing tasks if given a longer response window. This has implications for diagnosis and for providing a potential differential diagnosis tool.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohsin Ahmed M. Shaikh

Keywords

Related Articles

EDITORIAL

I invite you to read the first number of the Journal of Hearing Science for 2015.

A REVIEW OF HEARING AID TELECONSULTATION IN BRAZIL

Since 1993, Brazil’s public Unified Health System (SUS) has been enhancing the provision of hearing healthcare services, ranging from prevention to intervention. The provision of quality services is challenged by the cou...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP381552
  • DOI 10.17430/903099
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohsin Ahmed M. Shaikh (2017). EFFECT OF EXTENDING THE RESPONSE WINDOW AND OF SUBJECT PRACTICE ON MEASURES OF AUDITORY PROCESSING IN CHILDREN WITH LEARNING OR READING DISABILITY. Journal of Hearing Science, 7(3), 37-43. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-381552