Effect of Layered Curriculum in Problem Solving Skills of Students in Science and Technology Course

Journal Title: International Journal of Educational Methodology - Year 2019, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

This study mainly aims to determine the effect of layered curriculum on problem solving skills of students in science and technology course. The study group of the research is the 6th grade students of an elementary school in the center of Malatya. The mixed method, which includes quantitative and qualitative research patterns, was used. In the quantitative dimension of the study; in order to find the answers for the1st, 2nd and 3th sub problems, the study group consists of 60 students, 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. In the quantitative dimension, “The Problem Solving Skills Test” which is developed by the researcher has been used. In the study, the qualitative data have been collected during the application by quoting from the students’ diaries and researchers’ diaries and after the application by using semi structured interview forms and examining documents. To analyze the quantitative data t-test was used and to analyze the qualitative data, descriptive analysis and content analysis were used. The study, while significant differentiation has not been observed between point average of control group students in pre-test problem solving skills and post-test point average; there has been a significant differentiation in favor of the post-test between point average of experimental students pre-test and post-test problem solving skills. Experimental group students encountered problems particularly in B and A layers during the period they performed Layered Curriculum activities. Also, there has been a significant differentiation in favor of the experimental group between experimental group students who were subjected to the Layered Curriculum activities and control group students who continued the existing curriculum. It was concluded that, experimental group students took responsibility in Layered Curriculum activities both individually and within a group, and used their problem solving skills when they face a problem.

Authors and Affiliations

Sevda Koc Akran, Oguz Gurbuzturk

Keywords

Related Articles

The Predictive Role of Homophobia and Unconditional Self-Acceptance on Respect of Differences in Psychological Counselor Candidates

This research was conducted to investigate the predictive role of homophobia and unconditional self-acceptance on respect of differences in psychological counselor candidates. Participants were 239 psychological counselo...

Inuit Voices on Quality Education in Nunavut: Policy Implications

This paper is based on a research that explored how Inuit community members in Nunavut Territory, Canada, conceptualized quality education in the socio-cultural context of the territory. Data were collected through telep...

The Use of New Technologies in Basic Education: An Approach to Profile of Indigenous Ecuadorians

This article aims to define the profile of Ecuadorian indigenous students who study at different levels of basic education in Ecuador in the context of the application and use of emerging technologies in the last five ye...

Communication between Students and Teachers in Realization of Extracurricular Activities

Extracurricular activities represent educational, preplanned actions which enable complete confirmation of students’ personality as well as development of their communication skills and competencies; whilst they enable t...

Altruism and Popularity

Popularity, as a manifestation of social status, has been widely researched and determined by group members. Prosocial behaviors are actions with intention of benefiting others or society as whole with little or no perso...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP469085
  • DOI 10.12973/ijem.5.1.147
  • Views 146
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sevda Koc Akran, Oguz Gurbuzturk (2019). Effect of Layered Curriculum in Problem Solving Skills of Students in Science and Technology Course. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(1), 135-150. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-469085