Effects of ignorance and information on judgments and decisions

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 5

Abstract

We compared Turkish and English students’ soccer forecasting for English soccer matches. Although the Turkish students knew very little about English soccer, they selected teams on the basis of familiarity with the team (or its identified city); their prediction success was surprisingly similar to knowledgeable English students—consistent with Goldstein and Gigerenzer’s (1999; 2002) characterization of the recognition heuristic. The Turkish students made forecasts for some of the matches with additional information—the half-time scores. In this and a further study, where British students predicting matches for foreign teams could choose whether or not to use half-time information, we found that predictions that could be made by recognition alone were influenced by the half-time information. We consider the implications of these findings in the context of Goldstein and Gigerenzer’s (2002, p. 82) suggestion that “… no other information can reverse the choice determined by recognition” and a recent more qualified statement (Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 2011) indicating that two processes, recognition and evaluation guide the adaptive selection of the recognition heuristic.

Authors and Affiliations

Peter Ayton, Dilek Önkal and Lisa McReynolds

Keywords

Related Articles

Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations

Previous work showed that people find explanations more satisfying when they contain irrelevant neuroscience information. The current studies investigate why this effect happens. In Study 1 (N=322), subjects judged psych...

Exploring the time-saving bias: How drivers misestimate time saved when increasing speed

According to the time-saving bias, drivers underestimate the time saved when increasing from a low speed and overestimate the time saved when increasing from a relatively high speed. Previous research used a specific typ...

Do minorities like nudges? The role of group norms in attitudes towards behavioral policy

Attitudes of public groups towards behavioral policy interventions (or nudges) can be important for both the policy makers who design and deploy nudges, and to researchers who try to understand when and why some nudges a...

Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues

Previous research on anchoring has shown this heuristic to be a very robust psychological phenomenon ubiquitous across many domains of human judgment and decision-making. Despite the prevalence of anchoring effects, rese...

American’s desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them

A large body of survey research offers evidence that citizens are not always fully aware of the economic and political realities in their respective countries. Norton and Ariely (2011) extended this research to the domai...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677825
  • DOI -
  • Views 161
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Peter Ayton, Dilek Önkal and Lisa McReynolds (2011). Effects of ignorance and information on judgments and decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677825