Effects of main actor, outcome and affect on biased braking speed judgments
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 3
Abstract
Subjects who judged speed in a driving scenario overestimated how fast they could decelerate when speeding compared to when keeping within the speed limit (Svenson, 2009). The purpose of the present studies were to replicate studies conducted in Europe with subjects in the U.S., to study the influence of speed unit (kph vs. mph), affective reactions to outcome (collision) and identity of main actor (driver) on braking speed judgments. The results replicated the European findings and the outcome affective factor (passing a line/killing a child) and the actor factor (subject/driver in general) had significant effects on judgments of braking speed. The results were related to psychological theory and applied implications were discussed.
Authors and Affiliations
Ola Svenson, Gabriella Eriksson, Paul Slovic, C. K. Mertz and Tina Fuglestad
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677888
- DOI -
- Views 150
- Downloads 0
The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations
An insurance policy may not only affect the consequences for victims but also for perpetrators. In six experiments we find that people recommend milder punishments for perpetrators when the victim was insured, although p...
The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making
A four-fold classification of emotions with respect to their functions in decision making is proposed. It is argued that emotions are not homogenous concerning their role in decision making, but that four distinct functi...
Contamination without contact: An examination of intention-based contagion
Contagion refers to the belief that individuals or objects can acquire the essence of a particular source, such as a disgusting product or an immoral person, through physical contact. This paper documents beliefs in a "c...
Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard.
We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...
Do the Right Thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality
Decades of experimental research show that some people forgo personal gains to benefit others in unilateral anonymous interactions. To explain these results, behavioral economists typically assume that people have social...