Efficacy of eperisone and tizanidine on visual and auditory reaction time: A prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial

Journal Title: National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue 8

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal diseases with painful reflex muscle spasm have a high prevalence. Because of reflex muscle spasm, muscle relaxants are frequently used either alone or in combination with analgesics. Eperisone inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels in brain stem and tizanidine acts on imidazoline and α2-adrenergic receptor to relax muscle spasm and relieves pain. The development of sedation seems to be the major limiting factor in the use of muscle relaxants for treatment as they can affect daily activity and decrease working capability. Aims and Objectives: The present trial conducted to evaluate the effect of eperisone and tizanidine on visual and auditory reaction time. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, parallel group, randomized clinical trial. A total of 115 patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in Group A received tablet eperisone 100 mg and patients in Group B received tablet tizanidine 2 mg for 7 days. Primary outcome measures were changed in visual and auditory reaction time from baseline to day 7. Secondary outcome measure of the trial was change in the visual analog scale (VAS) score of the sedation from baseline to day 7. Results: On day 7, the difference in visual reaction time in Group A and B was 0.014 and 0.077, respectively, and this difference is statistically significant (P = 0.029). Difference in Auditory reaction time on day 7 in Group A and B were 0.007 and 0.091, respectively, and it is statistically significant (P = 0.004). There was increase in sedation score in Group B by 0.34 and it is statistically significant (P = 0.015). Conclusion: Tizanidine increases visual and auditory reaction time and sedation which is not seen with eperisone. Eperisone is a preferred alternative for muscle relaxation to avoid these effects.

Authors and Affiliations

Shadab Munawar Moosa, Maaz Hussain Syed, Yaser Mohammed Askari

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of gum arabic and Nigella sativa on T-helper1 and T-helper2 immune response in Wistar rats infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Background: The herbal medications are widely used in folk medicine for treatment of variable diseases and infection. Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) is a Gram-positive bacteria that cause severe organ affection, especially i...

Antifungal properties of soleshine - An in vitro study

Background: Soleshine is a polyherbal formulation meant to be used to heal cracks on heels, protecting sole from chaffs, marketed by Rumi Herbal Pvt Ltd., Chennai. The active ingriedients are Azadirachta indica, Lawsonia...

Hardness of tap water samples in Manila City, Philippines through complexometric titration

Background: Water hardness varies depending on the source, treatment procedures, and pipeline conditions among others, though not of immediate concern in water quality control but may have significant health, infrastruct...

Lower significant rate of etomidate-induced myoclonus for procedural sedation in emergency department of a tertiary care hospital

Background: Etomidate drug is commonly used for procedural sedation in the emergency department (ED). The incidence rate of etomidate-induced myoclonus is 33%. Aims and Objectives: In this study, we aimed to contradict t...

Pattern of drug usage among medical students in Tumkur, Karnataka

Background: Scheduled drugs are also purchased without prescriptions, which is a cause for concern. Educational status is an important determinant of self-medication. Student drug use surveys provide an essential source...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP290573
  • DOI 10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0309517042017
  • Views 66
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shadab Munawar Moosa, Maaz Hussain Syed, Yaser Mohammed Askari (2017). Efficacy of eperisone and tizanidine on visual and auditory reaction time: A prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 7(8), 839-843. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-290573