Embodiment of the Interpretant in a Sign: Reconsider the Concept of a Sign as a Factor of Social Construction in the Frame of Embodied and Disembodied Mind

Journal Title: Studia Warmińskie - Year 2017, Vol 54, Issue 54

Abstract

Social reality is semiotically constructed through a sign and sign relations as the mechanism of mediation and creation of “being together”. Social reality is in a constant creative process of dynamic change. It is provided by an intellectual interpretation of the mechanism itself, the real world, the being of other, signs and sign relations, through which a person finds the meaning of his/her being and is included in the overall construction of social reality. Therefore, the dynamic movement of thought to knowledge, to sense, to the joy of everyday life is made through an interpretation as a communicative and semiotic process of searching and involving the general community to another being. Historically, the most important models of signs and sign mediation is the sign model by F. de Saussure and Ch.S. Peirce. These models have long been criticized, but remained fundamental in the socio-semiotic mechanism of mediation between subject and object of knowledge and the construction of social reality. Following the publication of Ch. Taylor’s book “Sources of the self”, the concept of F. de Saussure and Ch.S. Peirce clearly gained social significance, in light of which many hidden mechanisms of semiotic construction of social reality become clear. Open-mindedness, which is the core process of semiosis, has a great importance for the construction of social reality. Basically, thinking is directed at the construction of a new body, the interpretant is directed at constructing a new interpreter. Of course, the construction of the body and physicality is not core one, but a peripheral process. However, it is not devoid of social value and also has potential in the construction of social community “being together”. Intelligent processes are rooted in the daily functioning of the body as their carrier, and the interpretant therefore provides an essential concrete interpreter. If the interpretant aimed against the interpreter as its carrier, then the question arises about “mechanism of truth” of the interpretant.

Authors and Affiliations

Volodymyr Kovchak

Keywords

Related Articles

Modlitwa o pokój troską o ład międzynarodowy w nauczaniu Jana Pawła II

Pokój we współczesnym świecie nie jest oczywisty, gdyż stale ulega różnorakim zagrożeniom spowodowanym toczącymi się konfliktami, działaniami terrorystycznymi i nieustannym łamaniem podstawowych praw człowieka. Wielu rzą...

Konferencje dekanalne w aspekcie kanoniczno-duszpasterskim

The aim of this article is to introduce the deaneries conferences in canonical and pastoral terms. In the first part the history of the deaneries conferences is presented. The second part introduces forms of convocation...

Historyczny i ideologiczny kontekst męczeństwa sióstr św. Katarzyny na Warmii w 1945 r.

W wyniku przeprowadzonej przez Armię Czerwoną ofensywy zimą 1945 r. w Prusach Wschodnich, setki tysięcy Niemców znalazło się w okrążeniu. Rozpoczęła się wówczas chaotyczna ewakuacja wojska i cywilów, głównie drogą morską...

Katolicka rodzina wobec różnorodności kulturowej

W artykule przedstawiono zagadnienie relacji międzykulturowych na wybranych przez autora przykładach spotkań w codziennych sytuacjach pomiędzy tubylcami żyjącymi w zasadniczo katolickim społeczeństwie, w którym model życ...

Наброски к классификации изображения коней в восточно-европейской традиции иконописания

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the image of the horses in the iconographic plots. The author outlined the main ways to classify these animals in the Eastern European tradition of icon painting. The divisi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP311190
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Volodymyr Kovchak (2017). Embodiment of the Interpretant in a Sign: Reconsider the Concept of a Sign as a Factor of Social Construction in the Frame of Embodied and Disembodied Mind. Studia Warmińskie, 54(54), 79-91. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-311190