Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 3
Abstract
A gender difference in risk preferences, with women being more averse to risky choices, is a robust experimental finding. Speculating on the sources of this difference, Croson and Gneezy recently pointed to the tendency for women to experience emotions more strongly and suggested that feeling more strongly about negative outcomes would lead to greater risk-aversion. Here we test this hypothesis in an international survey with 424 respondents from India and 416 from US where we ask questions about a hypothetical lottery. In both countries we find that emotions about outcomes are stronger among women, and that this effect partially mediates gender difference in willingness to enter the lottery.
Authors and Affiliations
Kimmo Eriksson and Brent Simpson
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677733
- DOI -
- Views 96
- Downloads 0
The price of not putting a price on love
We examine financial challenges of purchasing items that are readily-available yet symbolic of loving relationships. Using weddings and funerals as case studies, we find that people indirectly pay to avoid taboo monetary...
Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice
The current study looks at the role working memory plays in risky-choice framing. Eighty-six participants took the Automatic OSPAN, a measurement of working memory; this was followed by a risky-choice framing task. Parti...
I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety
Prior research on self-other differences involving risk have found that individuals make riskier decisions for others than for the self in situations where risk taking is valued. We expand this research by examining whet...
Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect
According to the Selective Accessibility Model of anchoring, the comparison question in the standard anchoring paradigm activates information that is congruent with an anchor. As a consequence, this information will be m...
A cautionary note on global recalibration
We report a mathematical result that casts doubt on the possibility of recalibration of probabilities using calibration curves. We then discuss how to interpret this result in the light of behavioral research.