Estimation of stochastic traffic capacity using extreme value theory and censoring: A case study in Salem, New Hampshire

Journal Title: Archives of Transport - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 48

Abstract

In this work, we introduce a method of estimating stochastic freeway capacity using elements of both extreme value theory and survival analysis. First, we define capacity data, or estimates of the capacity of the roadway, as the daily maximum flow values. Then, under a survival analysis premise, we introduce censoring into our definition. That is, on days when flows are sufficiently high and congestion occurs, corresponding flow maxima are considered true estimates of capacity; otherwise, for those days that do not observe high flows or congestion, flow maxima are deemed censored observations and capacities must be higher than the observations. By extreme value theory, the collection of flow maxima (block maxima) can be appropriately approximated with a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution. Because of small sample sizes and the presence of censoring, a Bayesian framework is pursued for model fitting and parameter estimation. To lend credence to our proposed methodology, the procedure is applied to real-world traffic stream data collected by the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) at a busy location on Interstate I-93 near Salem, New Hampshire. Data were collected over a period of 11 months and raw data were aggregated into 15-minute intervals. To assess our procedure, and to provide proof of concept, several validation procedures are presented. First, using distinct training and validation subsets of our data, the procedure yields accurate predictions of highway capacity. Next, our procedure is applied to a training set to yield random capacities which are then used to predict breakdown in the validation set. The frequency of these predicted breakdowns is found to be statistically similar to observed breakdowns observed in our validation set. Lastly, after comparing our methodology to other methods of stochastic capacity estimation, we find our procedure to be highly successful.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Eric M. LAFLAMME, Paul J. OSSENBRUGGEN

Keywords

Related Articles

Development of a statistically-based methodology for analyzing automatic safety treatments at isolated high-speed signalized intersections

Crashes at isolated rural intersections, particularly those involving vehicles traveling perpendicularly to each other, are especially dangerous due to the high speeds involved. Consequently, transportation agencies are...

Vehicle selection model with respect to Economic Order Quantity

The matter of vehicle selection, optimizing the order quantity or optimizing logistics costs is extensively discussed in both Polish and foreign literature. In numerous publications, the necessity of decision making in t...

Improvement of the regenerating energy accounting system on the direct current railways

Purpose. Monitoring of current state of quantitative indices of regenerative energy in the suburban movement, the analysis of the factors influencing its volumes and improvement the principles of the train regenerative e...

Assessment of Driver’s Reaction Times in Diverisified Research Environments

Reaction time is one of the basic parameters that characterize the driver and very important in the analysis of accident situations in road traffic. This paper describes research studies on the reaction time evaluation a...

THE INF-SUP CONDITION TESTS FOR SHELL/PLATE FINITE ELEMENTS

Development of high-performance finite elements for thick, moderately thick, as well as thin shells and plates, was one of the active areas of the finite element technology for 40 years, followed by hundreds of publicati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP431370
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8366
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eric M. LAFLAMME, Paul J. OSSENBRUGGEN (2018). Estimation of stochastic traffic capacity using extreme value theory and censoring: A case study in Salem, New Hampshire. Archives of Transport, 4(48), 61-75. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-431370